Cited by 191Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMesenchymal stem cell research

Remyelination in multiple sclerosis

Lassmann, Hans, Brück, Wolfgang, Lucchinetti, Claudia, Rodriguez, Moses·1997·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Stimulation of remyelination in multiple sclerosis lesions may be one possible therapeutic approach. However, since the pathology and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis may be heterogeneous, it is important to analyze in what patients and at what stages of the disease such a therapy can be reasonable and feasible. Spontaneous remyelination is pronounced in some MS patients. The extent of remyelination correlates well with the presence of oligodendrocytes in the lesions. Yet, the source and origin of the remyelinating cells is still unclear. These may be derived from either undifferentiated progenitor cells or, in part from mature oligodendrocytes, that have escaped destruction during lesional activity. Complete remyelination of plaques is possible, leading to the formation of 'shadow plaques'. No reliable data are available at present on the frequency of remyelination in different forms of MS. However, most studies agree that remyelination is especially prominent at the early stages of the disease, whereas it is sparse after several years of disease duration. In addition, very little remyelination is found in cases of primary progressive MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135245859700300213

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remyelination is a regenerative process of the adult CNS that restores saltatory impulse conduction and trophic support to axons.

    “Remyelination is a crucial regenerative process in demyelinating diseases, limiting persisting damage to the CNS. It restores saltatory nerve conduction and ensures trophic support of axons.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 191

Authors
Lassmann, H., Brück, W., Lucchinetti, C., & Rodriguez, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
1997-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
133-136
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2167626938
Cited by
191
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS24180, R01NS024180)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
remyelination, multiple sclerosis, oligodendrocytes, disease duration, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, remyelination therapy, demyelination
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Regeneration, Oligodendroglia, Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review