The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society
Abstract
How is unrivalled American power reshaping 21st-century international society? Is the United States an empire, in fact or in the making? This article attempts to elaborate the conceptual resources required to answer such questions. I focus on multiple forms of hierarchy in anarchy and diverse practices of sovereign inequality—concepts that most mainstream perspectives ignore, find paradoxical, or even dismiss as self-contradictory. After defining empire and hierarchy in anarchy, I present a typology of international orders tuned to thinking about empire and its alternatives. The central section of the article explores three classes of formal inequalities common during the Westphalian era—special rights of Great Powers, restricted rights for outlaws, and a wide range of particular practices of ‘semi-sovereignty’. I then sketch ten historically grounded models of hierarchical international relations. Two brief applications to contemporary American power seek to illustrate the value of this conceptual apparatus. Throughout, my focus is on appreciating the precise nature and considerable variety of international inequalities. I argue that the concepts of hierarchy in anarchy and sovereign inequality, but not empire, are essential for understanding the shape and development of contemporary international order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of International Politics
Frankel, J., & Waltz, K. N. (1980) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40201892 · Cited by 8,506
Theory of International Politics, by Kenneth N. Waltz
Randle, R. F. (1980) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2149594 · Cited by 6,358
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
Duncan, O. D., & Sills, D. L. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092889 · Cited by 3,486
Bull, H. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-39340-0 · Cited by 3,316
Bull, H. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9 · Cited by 3,316
The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics
Walker, R. B. J., & Bull, H. (1978) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40201670 · Cited by 2,742
Philosophy and Public Affairs: A Philosopher’s Perspective on Government Committees of Inquiry
Warnock, M., & Journal, I. P. (1990) · Irish Philosophical Journal · doi:10.5840/irishphil199071/21 · Cited by 2,576
Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy
Krasner, S. D. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400823260 · Cited by 2,477
Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0575 · Cited by 1,727
Gallagher, J., & Robinson, R. (1953) · The Economic History Review · doi:10.2307/2591017 · Cited by 1,208
Cited by
What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate
NEXON, D. H., & WRIGHT, T. (2007) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055407070220 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of International Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-170
- ISSN
- 1354-0661 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3713
- OpenAlex
- W2137388546
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 42.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1354066106064505
- The paper
- Donnelly, J. (2006). Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106064505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.