The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts
Open accessAbstract
Methods have increasingly been placed at the heart of theoretical and empirical research in International Relations (IR) and social sciences more generally. This article explores the role of methods in IR and argues that methods can be part of a critical project if reconceptualized away from neutral techniques of organizing empirical material and research design. It proposes a two-pronged reconceptualization of critical methods as devices which enact worlds and acts which disrupt particular worlds. Developing this conceptualization allows us to foreground questions of knowledge and politics as stakes of method and methodology rather than exclusively of ontology, epistemology or theory. It also allows us to move away from the dominance of scientificity (and its weaker versions of systematicity and rigour) to understand methods as less pure, less formal, messier and more experimental, carrying substantive political visions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2024) · Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,810
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 6,992
Law, J. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203481141 · Cited by 3,106
Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art
Foster, D. W., Kristeva, J., Roudiez, L. S., Gora, T., & Jardine, A. (1981) · Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature · doi:10.2307/1347112 · Cited by 3,062
Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics.
Ward, K., & Enloe, C. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075007 · Cited by 2,439
Kristeva, J. (2024) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/kris21459 · Cited by 2,330
Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics
Enloe, C. (2014) · doi:10.1525/9780520957282 · Cited by 2,165
Inside/outside: international relations as political theory
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6414 · Cited by 1,957
Cited by
Reflexive discourse analysis: A methodology for the practice of reflexivity
Alejandro, A. (2021) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066120969789 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Aradau, C., & Huysmans, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of International Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-30
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 596-619
- ISSN
- 1354-0661 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3713
- OpenAlex
- W2154229346
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 75.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1354066112474479
- The paper
- Aradau, C., & Huysmans, J. (2014). Critical methods in International Relations: The politics of techniques, devices and acts. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112474479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.