The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AmÈdÈe or How to Get Rid of It: Social Representations from a Dialogical Perspective
Abstract
The theory of social representations and communication belongs to a broadly conceived family of approaches studying interdependencies between socially and individually shared knowledge, which are based on dialogical epistemology. This epistemology, in order to ask questions about stability in knowledge, presupposes its change. The theory of social representations as a theory of social knowledge is characterized by the following concerns. First, it conceives of the dynamics of thought, language and social practices as interdependent socio-cultural and individual phenomena which are co-constructed by means of tension and polarization of antinomies. The construction of knowledge can be represented as a dynamic semiotic triangle and the change of knowledge can be represented in terms of three-step processes. Second, the theory of social representations and communication is based on the set of interrelated and dialogically defined concepts generating hypotheses, for example themata, anchoring, objectification and communicative genres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Mind, Self, and Society: The Definitive Edition
Mead, G. H., Joas, H., Huebner, D. R., & Morris, C. W. (2015) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226112879.001.0001 · Cited by 11,018
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/720466 · Cited by 8,470
The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
Wasiolek, E., Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., & Emerson, C. (1982) · Comparative Literature · doi:10.2307/1770763 · Cited by 7,540
Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
Bakhtin, M. (1984) · doi:10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 · Cited by 5,909
An Essay concerning Human Understanding
Locke, J. (1690) · The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020 · Cited by 5,192
Social Construction of Reality
(2020) · The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society · doi:10.4135/9781483375519.n617 · Cited by 4,707
Voices of the Mind: Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action
Wertsch, J. V. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674045101 · Cited by 4,099
Marxism and the philosophy of language
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,967
Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition
Landesman, B. M. (1992) · Cited by 2,899
Cited by
Making ‘Context’ Concrete: A Dialogical Approach to the Society–Health Relation
Cornish, F. (2004) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105304040894 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Markov·, I.
- Venue
- Culture & Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 419-460
- ISSN
- 1354-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7056
- OpenAlex
- W2272874796
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AmÈdÈe or How to Get Rid of It: Social Representations from a Dialogical Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1354067x0064002
- The paper
- Markov·, I. (2000). AmÈdÈe or How to Get Rid of It: Social Representations from a Dialogical Perspective. Culture & Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x0064002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.