Cited by 280Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The Case for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Health Services Research

Barbour, Rosaline S.·1999·Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Abstract

A judicious combination of qualitative and quantitative methods can play a valuable role in health services research. This paper reviews the main reasons for combining methods: for different stages in a project; to compensate for the shortcomings of individual methods; and for the purpose of 'triangulation'. It examines the potential for qualitative approaches to contribute to quantitative work--by providing insights into the process of data construction, identifying relevant variables to be studied, furnishing explanations for unexpected or anomalous findings, and generating hypotheses or research questions for further investigation. Similarly, qualitative work can be enhanced by using quantitative techniques--albeit often in a modified form--in analysing data, developing sampling strategies, and amalgamating findings from separate qualitative studies. Although there is potential to develop multi-method approaches, there remains an important role for rigorous studies employing either qualitative or quantitative methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135581969900400110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbour, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Barbour, Rosaline S.
Venue
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
1999-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
39-43
ISSN
  • 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1060
OpenAlex
W2123091787
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
48.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
mixed methods, qualitative-quantitative integration, triangulation, dataset construction, hypothesis generation, sampling strategy
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, United Kingdom, Health Services Research, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review