Patient Satisfaction with Store-and-Forward Teledermatology
Open accessAbstract
We assessed patient satisfaction with a nurse-led store-and-forward teledermatology service in Manchester. A teledermatology nurse obtained the patient's history, took digital photographs of the patient's skin lesion and then sent the information to a hospital dermatologist, who responded with management advice the following week. Of 141 patients who attended their teledermatology appointment, 123 (50 male, 73 female) completed the study questionnaire (87%). The average age of respondents was 42 years (SD 17, range 18–90 years). Ninety-three per cent reported that they were happy with the teleconsultation while 86% reported that it was more convenient than going to the outpatient clinic. Forty per cent agreed that they would feel more comfortable seeing the dermatologist in person while only 58% were comfortable with not speaking to the dermatologist about their skin condition. The absence of interaction with the dermatologist and the delay in receiving management advice may have contributed to the somewhat low satisfaction rates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most asynchronous digital health cases had a total turnaround time of less than 72 hours.
“Most asynchronous digital health cases had a total turnaround time of less than 72 hours, which is similar to our review finding [93].”
From Effectiveness and Acceptability of Asynchronous Digital Health in Asthma Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [93]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Williams, T., May, C., Esmail, A., Ellis, N., Griffiths, C., Stewart, E., Fitzgerald, D., Morgan, M., Mould, M., Pickup, L., & Kelly, S.
- Affiliations
- School of Primary Care, University of Manchester;
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1_suppl
- Pages
- 45-46
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W1979284322
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Keywords
- store-and-forward teledermatology, patient satisfaction, teleconsultation, skin lesions, dermatology, patient comfort
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Physician-Patient Relations, Skin Diseases, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review