Cited by 41Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareHealthcare Systems and Technology

Patient Satisfaction with Store-and-Forward Teledermatology

Open access
Williams, Tracy, May, Carl, Esmail, Aneez, Ellis, Nicola, Griffiths, Christopher, Stewart, Elizabeth, Fitzgerald, David, Morgan, Michele +3 more·2001·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We assessed patient satisfaction with a nurse-led store-and-forward teledermatology service in Manchester. A teledermatology nurse obtained the patient's history, took digital photographs of the patient's skin lesion and then sent the information to a hospital dermatologist, who responded with management advice the following week. Of 141 patients who attended their teledermatology appointment, 123 (50 male, 73 female) completed the study questionnaire (87%). The average age of respondents was 42 years (SD 17, range 18–90 years). Ninety-three per cent reported that they were happy with the teleconsultation while 86% reported that it was more convenient than going to the outpatient clinic. Forty per cent agreed that they would feel more comfortable seeing the dermatologist in person while only 58% were comfortable with not speaking to the dermatologist about their skin condition. The absence of interaction with the dermatologist and the delay in receiving management advice may have contributed to the somewhat low satisfaction rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x010070s118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 41

Authors
Williams, T., May, C., Esmail, A., Ellis, N., Griffiths, C., Stewart, E., Fitzgerald, D., Morgan, M., Mould, M., Pickup, L., & Kelly, S.
Affiliations
  • School of Primary Care, University of Manchester;
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2001-01
Volume
7
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
45-46
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W1979284322
Cited by
41
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
store-and-forward teledermatology, patient satisfaction, teleconsultation, skin lesions, dermatology, patient comfort
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Physician-Patient Relations, Skin Diseases, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review