Cited by 41Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

A meta-review of Internet computer-based psychological treatments for anxiety disorders

Peñate, Wenceslao, Fumero, Ascensión·2016·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Internet computer-based psychological treatments have enjoyed rapid growth. Today, there are a number of them available for many mental disorders and psychological problems. Internet-based psychological treatments for anxiety disorders and phobias are amongst the most frequently observed. Treatment results with these resources are promising, but inconclusive. METHODS: This paper reviews 11 systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the efficacy of Internet-based psychological treatments for anxiety disorders, including studies and clinical trials covering the majority of anxiety disorders and phobias, usually with adult patient samples. RESULTS: In general, these reviews agree on the efficacy of Internet-based psychological treatment as compared with non-treatment groups (with large effect sizes), finding similar efficacy compared with face-to-face therapies. Internet-based psychological treatments are further improved when combined with some type of therapist contact. On the negative side, some systematic reviews highlight high attrition rates of Internet-based psychological treatments. DISCUSSION: These findings remain inconclusive and more refined reviews (involving patient samples, therapy comparisons, type of therapist contact, etc.) are needed, in order to establish the scope and limits of Internet-based psychological treatments for anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x15586491

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 41

Authors
Peñate, W., & Fumero, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Corresponding author
Peñate, Wenceslao
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2015-05-29
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
3-11
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2291863270
Cited by
41
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
internet-based psychological treatment, computer-based therapy, anxiety disorders, phobia, treatment efficacy, therapist contact, attrition rates, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Patient Compliance, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review