Online group pain management for chronic pain: Preliminary results of a novel treatment approach to teletherapy
Abstract
Objective: This pilot study was designed to determine the feasibility, tolerability, safety, and efficacy of group teletherapy for persons with chronic pain. The aim was to present preliminary outcomes of an open trial of group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) teletherapy compared with an in-person chronic pain patient group. Methods: We recruited 47 chronic pain patients to participate in an 8-session, 2-hour-per-week, online, structured, CBT-oriented pain management group using WebEx and compared them with 46 subjects who participated in a parallel, content-matched, in-person, weekly group. Both groups included goal setting, skills training, relaxation exercises, group discussion, and practice assignments. All subjects completed baseline measures, which were repeated post-treatment. Those in the online group participated in weekly telephone interviews and rated the perceived helpfulness of the remote group. Results: The average age of the online group participants was 54.5 ( ± 14.3) years and 70.2% were female, compared with 59.7 ( ± 13.0) years of age and 57.8% females among the in-person group members. On follow-up, both CBT groups showed modest improvements on the outcome measures. Results of this preliminary investigation comparing online teletherapy with in-person CBT suggest similar benefit. Many participants in the online group rated their experience as very helpful (62.5%; 7–10/10) and most would recommend this programme to others (93.7%; 7–10/10). Discussion: Preliminary findings suggest that online group CBT may be as effective in improving coping among persons with chronic pain as in-person groups. More rigorous controlled trials are needed to adequately assess the outcome benefit of online teletherapy for chronic pain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been a call for better pain education among providers, increased use of social media, incorporation of online peer education and support, and daily monitoring of persons with opioid-treated chronic pain using innovative technology.
“There has been a call for better pain education among providers,72 increased use of social media, incorporation of online peer education and support,73,74 and daily monitoring of persons with opioid-treated chronic pain using innovative technology.75–77”
From Risk Factors for Self-Harm Ideation among Persons Treated with Opioids for Chronic Low Back Pain (2023) · cites this paper as [73]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Mariano, T. Y., Wan, L., Edwards, R. R., Lazaridou, A., Ross, E. L., & Jamison, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jamison, Robert N
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-08-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 209-216
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W2969453377
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- 2017 Harvard Medical School Norman E. Zinberg Fellowship (Zinberg Fellowship)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- chronic pain, group cognitive behavioral therapy, external beam radiotherapy, online group therapy, pain management, coping, feasibility and tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Chronic Pain, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review