Cited by 58Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Autism and reactive attachment/disinhibited social engagement disorders: Co-occurrence and differentiation

Mayes, Susan Dickerson, Calhoun, Susan L, Waschbusch, Daniel A, Baweja, Raman·2017·Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

DSM-5 ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition) Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder (DSED) are rare disorders sharing social difficulties with autism. The DSM-5 and ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revsion) state that RAD/DSED should not be diagnosed in children with autism. The purpose of our study is to determine whether children can meet criteria for both autism and RAD/DSED and to identify specific symptoms discriminating the disorders. Subjects were 486 children with autism and no RAD/DSED and 20 with RAD/DSED, 4-17 years of age. In total, 13 children with RAD/DSED met criteria for autism. Using the Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorder (CASD), there was no overlap in total scores between the RAD/DSED with autism group (score range = 15-27) versus the RAD/DSED without autism group (range = 7-10 ). The autism with and without RAD/DSED groups did not differ in CASD scores. Nine of the CASD autism symptoms were found only in the autism with and without RAD/DSED groups. Our study demonstrates that children can meet criteria for both autism and RAD/DSED and that the disorders are easily differentiated by the presence of specific autism symptoms. Autism is a neurogenetic disorder, and RAD/DSED results from severe social-emotional maltreatment. Given the different etiologies, there is no reason why a child cannot have both disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359104516678039

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayes, S. D., Calhoun, S. L., Waschbusch, D. A., & Baweja, R.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Mayes, Susan Dickerson
Venue
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
620-631
ISSN
  • 1359-1045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7021
OpenAlex
W2558538284
Cited by
58
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, reactive attachment disorder, disinhibited social engagement disorder, co-occurrence of disorders, diagnostic differentiation, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Social Behavior Disorders, Comorbidity, Reactive Attachment Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review