CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 699Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationHealth and Well-being Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Brazil

Siqueira Reis, Rodrigo, Ferreira Hino, Adriano Akira, Romélio Rodriguez Añez, Ciro·2010·Journal of Health Psychology
DOI 10.1177/1359105309346343
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The perceived stress scale (PSS-10) reliability and validity were evaluated in Brazilian adults. A two-stage translation procedure was employed to achieve a Portuguese version. Participants were 793 Brazilian university teachers. The exploratory factor analysis showed two factors with eigenvalues greater than 1.0 (56.8% of variance). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.83 (Factor 1), 0.77 (Factor 2) and 0.87 (Total Score). The test-retest reliability scores were 0.83 (Factor 1), 0.68 (Factor 2) and 0.86 (Total Score). PSS-10 and perceived health correlations ranged from -0.22 to -0.35. The PSS-10 showed an adequate reliability and validity supporting its use in this population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105309346343

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. ANEP., 2002, Brazilian criteria for economic classification
  2. Byrne, B.N., 2001, Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Rahwah, NJ
  3. Carrobles, J.A.I., 2001, Ansiedad y estrés, 7, 195
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., 2004, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.131 · DOI
  6. EpiData Association., 2000, EpiData Software [free computer software]
  7. Eskin, M., 1996, Introducing a Swedish version of an instrument measuring mental stress [report]
  8. Grava-Gubins, I., 2008, Canadian Family Physician, 54, 1424
  9. Muller, L., 2003, Encephale, 29, 507
  10. Weir, J.P., 2005, Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 19, 231

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 699

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Siqueira Reis, R., Ferreira Hino, A. A., & Romélio Rodriguez Añez, C.
Affiliations
  • Pontiff Catholic University of Paraná; Federal University of Paraná,
  • Pontiff Catholic University of Paraná; Federal University of Paraná
  • Pontiff Catholic University of Paraná
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
107-114
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
DOI
10.1177/1359105309346343
OpenAlex
W2108754912
Cited by
698
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 19
FWCI
26.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
Perceived Stress Scale, perceived stress, psychometric validation, Portuguese translation, university faculty, reliability statistics, factor structure, health perception, Brazilian adults
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Attitude to Health, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Occupational Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Stress, Psychological, Teaching, Universities, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review