Incremental validity of the comprehensive inventory of thriving in predicting self-reporting mental and physical health among community populations
Abstract
This study examined psychometric properties and 1-year predictive validity of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving in China. In total, 556 participants in Chinese communities completed the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving for confirmatory factor analysis. The other 533 individuals further completed the Flourishing Scale and Satisfaction With Life Scale and reported their physical and mental health 1 year later. The 18-factor correlated model showed a better goodness-of-fit than the seven-factor second-order related model. Thriving had higher correlation coefficients with depression, anxiety, stress, and doctor visits. The Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving is an efficient screening tool to differentiate the risk group from other groups and can predict health outcomes among community populations for active interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CIT negatively correlates with measures of depression (r = −0.46) and anxiety (r = −0.34).
“The CIT also negatively correlates with measures of depression (r = − 0.46) and anxiety (r = − 0.34) [88].”
From Patient-reported outcome measures for life engagement in mental health: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Duan, W., Fei, Y., Zhao, J., & Guo, X.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Duan, Wenjie
- Venue
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-02-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10-11
- Pages
- 1366-1373
- ISSN
- 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7277
- OpenAlex
- W2785649977
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Keywords
- thriving, Flourishing Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, predictive validity, psychometric properties, factor structure, mental health, physical health, depression, anxiety, stress, health screening, community population, Chinese adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety, China, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
