A teacher’s first language use in form-focused episodes in Spanish as a foreign language classroom
Abstract
This study investigates a teacher’s L1 use during focus-on-form episodes (FFEs). FFEs assist L2 learning by bringing learners’ attention to language. We studied the language used in FFEs in a Spanish as a foreign language (SFL) classroom to better understand the pedagogical purposes of L1 use in the classroom. We video-recorded 12 hours of an intermediate-high SFL classroom with an L1 English teacher at a US university. The audio data was segmented into FFEs and then coded (English L1, Spanish L2, mix) to reflect the language used in each of the teacher’s utterances. We also identified the linguistic areas (e.g., grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation) targeted in the FFEs. Chi-square and descriptive statistics were used to understand the relationship between the teacher’s language and the linguistic areas. Lastly, using the same data set, we conducted a qualitative analysis in order to depict the situations in which the teacher employed the L1 and L2. There was a significant relationship between the teacher’s language and the FFEs’ linguistic areas. Specifically, the L1 and L2 were used equally when FFEs concerned vocabulary and grammar. However, when FFEs concerned semantics, frequent code-switching occurred. The qualitative data illustrate that the language choice may depend on the interactional patterns and the complexity of the linguistic structure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both learners and teachers sometimes make effective use of the learner's L1 to address linguistic problems in the L2 when performing communicative tasks.
“Both learners and teachers sometimes make effective use of the learner's L1 to address linguistic problems in the L2 when performing communicative tasks (Nakatsukasa & Loewen, 2015;Storch and Wigglesworth, 2003).”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Nakatsukasa & Loewen, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Nakatsukasa, K., & Loewen, S.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-16
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-149
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2160791974
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 25.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- first language use, form-focused instruction, Spanish as a foreign language, code-switching, grammar instruction, vocabulary teaching, pronunciation teaching, semantics, interaction patterns, second language teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review