The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language teacher noticing: A socio-cognitive window on classroom realities
Abstract
This article introduces the construct of teacher noticing, situates it in research on second language teacher cognition, and considers its implications for research on second language teacher training, acknowledging socio-cognitive perspectives on language learning and teaching. We then present a mixed-methods observational study that utilized quantitative and qualitative approaches to study novice teacher noticing in the context of teaching demonstrations carried out as part of eight participants’ undergraduate course requirements. Teacher noticing was defined as awareness of features of second language classroom interaction that may influence student learning. The goals of the study were to: (1) assess our approach to studying teacher noticing, (2) examine the interactional contexts in which teacher noticing occurs, and (3) identify themes in novice teacher noticing. The results indicated that the stimulated recall methodology used was, not surprisingly, sensitive to the time delay between teaching demonstrations and recall interviews. Nonetheless, all participants reported noticing. Teacher noticing occurred primarily when the participants were teaching to the whole class and tended to involve the difference between plans vs. reality, noticing as a trigger for action, and individual learner contributions. The discussion weighs the strengths and limitations of this study and explains how a focus on the significance that teachers place on classroom interactions they become aware of during lessons may benefit research on language teacher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These disparities may be attributed to the distinct subjects and research questions that SR measures aim to address (Jackson and Cho, 2018;Tiainen et al., 2018).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Jackson and Cho, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 1×
“It should be clear by now that the psychological processes and outcomes associated with teacher noticing differ from those of noticing by L2 learners (Schmidt, 1990, 1995, 2012, see also Bergsleithner, Frota, & Yoshioka, 2013; Robinson, 2003).”
BackgroundFocus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1111/1540-4781.00159 · DOI · Paper page
- Bailey K.M., 2012, The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching, 23, 10.1017/9781009024778.004 · doi:10.1017/9781009024778.004
- Batstone R., 2010, Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning, 3
- Bergsleithner J.M., 2013, Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt
- Borg S., 2006, Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice
- Borg S., 2013, Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis
- 10.1017/S0272263100005337 · DOI
- Breen M.P., 1987, Language learning tasks, 23
- Burton J., 2009, The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 298, 10.1017/9781139042710.039 · doi:10.1017/9781139042710.039
- Creswell J.W., 2011, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
- Crookes G., 2003, A practicum in TESOL: Professional development through teaching practice
- Farrell T.S.C., 2015, Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals
- Gass S.M., 2000, Stimulated recall methodology in second language research
- Gebhard J.G., 2009, The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 250, 10.1017/9781139042710.033 · DOI
- Knight J., 2014, Focus on teaching: Using video for high-impact instruction
- 10.2307/40264511 · DOI · Paper page
- Naiman N., 1978, The good language learner
- Ortega L., 2011, Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, 167
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/tea.21063 · DOI
- Schmidt R., 1995, Attention and awareness in foreign language learning
- 10.1515/9781614510932.27 · doi:10.1515/9781614510932.27
- Schön D.A., 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
- Sherin M.G., 2003, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9, 92, 10.5951/MTMS.9.2.0092 · doi:10.5951/mtms.9.2.0092
- 10.4324/9780203832714 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1075/aals.1.10erd · DOI
- Tsui A.B.M., 2009, The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 190, 10.1017/9781139042710.025 · doi:10.1017/9781139042710.025
- van Es E.A., 2002, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571
- 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Sert, O., Gynne, A., & Larsson, M. (2025) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2024.2337184 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, D. O., & Cho, M.
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-08-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-46
- ISSN
- 1362-1688
- 1477-0954
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.