Cited by 9Innovative Teaching MethodsEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningHearing Impairment and Communication

Effects of inverted L2/Ln language pedagogy on student experiences and outcomes: The case of American Sign Language

Cripps, Jody H., Rosen, Russell S., Cooper, Sheryl B., Fenicle, Ronald, Sever-Hall, Aimee·2024·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Second language (L2) learning has largely occurred in the traditional lecture-based classroom setting. Studies show that the lecture format has an impact on student outcomes and perceptions of classroom learning. Negative impacts include insufficient time for reinforcement activities, reviewing lecture materials, and engaging in conversation between instructors and students. An innovative way to enhance L2 students’ classroom outcomes and perceptions is the inverted classroom pedagogy. This study assesses whether the inverted pedagogy leads to more positive student perspectives and higher student outcomes compared to traditional pedagogy in L2 classrooms in American Sign Language (ASL). In this study, student outcomes and instructor and student perceptions of inverted pedagogy for ASL are assessed using a mixed method design with one controlled (traditional) and one experimental (inverted) advanced ASL class in a post-secondary setting. Results suggest that the inverted pedagogy is an approach that is as viable as the traditional approach for teaching and learning ASL as an L2 that enables students to engage in meaningful activities and conversations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13621688211044240

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study comparing inverted and traditional ASL classrooms found comparable performance outcomes, although students in the inverted model reported more opportunities for practice, interaction, and conversational skill building.

    “One recent study comparing inverted and traditional ASL classrooms found comparable performance outcomes, although students in the inverted model reported more opportunities for practice, interaction, and conversational skill building [42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cripps, J. H., Rosen, R. S., Cooper, S. B., Fenicle, R., & Sever-Hall, A.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Towson University (US)
  • Howard County Public School System (US)
  • St. Catherine University, USA
Corresponding author
Cripps, Jody H.
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2021-10-05
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
2082-2110
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W3201771392
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
  • SOPHIA (St. Catherine University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
flipped classroom, American Sign Language, second language teaching, lecture method, student perceptions, student outcomes, sign language education, postsecondary education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review