Quo Vadis clinical genomics of ASD?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Today, up to 15% of autism variants can be linked to genetic determinants, with future projections that as much as 50% of genetic etiologies are discoverable using sequencing approaches.
“Today, up to 15% of autism variants can be linked to genetic determinants, with future projections that as much as to 50% of genetic etiologies are discoverable using sequencing approaches [26].”
From The contribution of environmental exposure to the etiology of autism spectrum disorder (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Tammimies, K., Falck-Ytter, T., & Bölte, S.
- Venue
- Autism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-261
- ISSN
- 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7005
- OpenAlex
- W2283023194
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Autism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, clinical genomics, genetic diagnosis, precision medicine
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Humans, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
