Assessment of racial and ethnic bias in autism spectrum disorder prevalence estimates from a US surveillance system.
Open accessAbstract
This study assessed potential under-ascertainment of autism spectrum disorder due to missing administrative information for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black children within the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. We analyzed data from two Network sites (Colorado and Wisconsin) for surveillance years 2012 and 2014 to determine whether children excluded from autism spectrum disorder prevalence estimates due to missing residency and other information differed from those included by race and ethnicity. We used multiple approaches to impute missing information to evaluate impacts on racial and ethnic disparities in autism spectrum disorder prevalence. Compared with confirmed autism spectrum disorder cases, those excluded due to missing residency were more than twice as likely to be Hispanic (19% vs 44%; p < 0.002), yet the number of cases excluded due to missing residency information was too small to account for prevalence differences. Confirmation of autism spectrum disorder case status was more likely for children with relevant health records than for those with school records only. Moreover, relevant health records were more likely to be missing for Black and Hispanic children than for White children. Observed disparities in autism spectrum disorder prevalence were not accounted for by missing demographic data, but may reflect disparities in healthcare access for developmental evaluations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A change to the ASD case definition for 2018 that no longer required clinician review of records could also contribute to higher prevalence among Black and Hispanic children who were less likely to have detailed health information available for review and therefore less likely to meet the case definition with previous methods.
“A change to the ASD case definition for 2018 that no longer required clinician review of records (12) could also contribute to higher prevalence among Black and Hispanic children who were less likely to have detailed health information available for review and therefore less likely to meet the case definition with previous methods (18).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015 Mental Disorders and DisabilitiesAamong Low-Income Children. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Authors
- Imm, P., White, T., & Durkin, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (US)
- Corresponding author
- Durkin, Maureen S
- Venue
- Autism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-03-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1927-1935
- ISSN
- 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7005
- PMC
- PMC6824598
- OpenAlex
- W2924482678
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Autism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30HD03352, U54HD090256)
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (UR3/DD000078, UR3/DD000677)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, prevalence estimates, racial and ethnic disparities, under-ascertainment, missing data, Hispanic children, non-Hispanic Black children, health records, student records, health care access, developmental evaluation, Colorado, Wisconsin
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Asian, Black or African American, Child, Colorado, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, United States, Wisconsin, Bias, Prevalence, White People, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Epidemiological Monitoring, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review