Cited by 78Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchMedical Research and PracticesMental Health and Psychiatry

‘ DSM-V is taking away our identity’: The reaction of the online community to the proposed changes in the diagnosis of Asperger’s disorder

Giles, David C·2014·Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine

Abstract

This article considers the fate of Asperger's disorder in the light of proposals for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) to collapse Asperger's disorder along with other pervasive developmental disorders into a general spectrum of autism. It is argued that a powerful lay and scientific culture has evolved around the concept of Asperger's disorder, which has found a particularly compelling voice over the last decade in the online Asperger community, with websites such as Wrong Planet recruiting tens of thousands of members. In order to assess the impact of these proposed changes on the online Asperger community, 19 threads on the topic of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) are analysed according to the arguments that community members put forward in favour of, or in opposition to, the proposals. Many members embrace the notion of the spectrum and have already coined a new identity - 'spectrumite' - to adapt to the diagnostic shift. Others, however, are suspicious of the motives behind the absorption of Asperger's disorder, and potential threats to the provision of services as well as the strong 'aspie' identity that reflects the large literature and the online public sphere around Asperger's disorder. To what extent this culture poses a challenge to the authority of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is uncertain at present.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363459313488006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The committee's early proposal to combine the DSM-IV's main three autism diagnoses into a single unified autism diagnosis exacerbated fears.

    “The committee's early proposal to combine the DSM-IV's main three autism diagnosis, Autistic Disorder, Asperger's Syndrome, and PDDNOS, into a single unified autism diagnosis exacerbated these fears (though it was not the origin of them, e.g. Giles [9]).”

    From Lobbying Autism's Diagnostic Revision in the DSM-5 (2020) · cites this paper as [9]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 78

Authors
Giles, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Winchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Giles, David C
Venue
Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine
Published
2013-06-05
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
179-195
ISSN
  • 1363-4593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7196
OpenAlex
W2146027190
Cited by
78
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, DSM-5, autism spectrum disorder, diagnostic classification, pervasive developmental disorders, mental health services
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Autistic Disorder, Communication, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Social Identification, Asperger Syndrome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review