Cited by 40Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFamily Support in IllnessGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Normal’ and ‘failing’ mothers: women’s constructions of maternal subjectivity while living with multiple sclerosis

Parton, Chloe, Katz, Terri, Ussher, Jane M·2019·Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis causes physical and cognitive impairment that can impact women’s experiences of motherhood. This study examined how women construct their maternal subjectivities, or sense of self as a mother, drawing on a framework of biographical disruption. A total of 20 mothers with a multiple sclerosis diagnosis took part in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using thematic decomposition to identify subject positions that women adopted in relation to cultural discourses of gender, motherhood and illness. Three main subject positions were identified: ‘The Failing Mother’, ‘Fear of Judgement and Burdening Others’ and ‘The Normal Mother’. Women’s sense of self as the ‘Failing Mother’ was attributed to the impact of multiple sclerosis, contributing to biographical disruption and reinforced through ‘Fear of Judgement and Burdening Others’ within social interactions. In accounts of the ‘Normal Mother’, maternal subjectivity was renegotiated by adopting strategies to manage the limitations of multiple sclerosis on mothering practice. This allowed women to self-position as ‘good’ mothers. Health professionals can assist women by acknowledging the embodied impact of multiple sclerosis on maternal subjectivities, coping strategies that women employ to address potential biographical disruption, and the cultural context of mothering, which contributes to women’s experience of subjectivity and well-being when living with multiple sclerosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363459317739442

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parton, C., Katz, T., & Ussher, J. M.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Parton, Chloe
Venue
Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine
Published
2017-11-01
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
516-532
ISSN
  • 1363-4593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7196
OpenAlex
W2765503393
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Western Sydney University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, motherhood, maternal subjectivity, biographical disruption, women with chronic illness, subject positions, fear of judgment, coping strategies, gender and illness, maternal identity, health worker support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Fatigue, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Judgment, Mothers, Multiple Sclerosis, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review