The shifting politics of patient activism: From bio-sociality to bio-digital citizenship
Open accessAbstract
Digital media provide novel tools for patient activists from disease- and condition-specific communities. While those with debilitating conditions or disabilities have long recognised the value of collective action for advancing their interests, digital media offer activists unparalleled opportunities to fulfil their goals. This article explores the shifting politics of ‘activism’ in the increasingly digitally mediated, commercialised context of healthcare, asking: what role have digital media played in the repertoire of activists’ strategies? And, to what extent and how has the use of such media impacted the very concept of activism? Building on sociological ideas on emergent forms of ‘biological citizenship’ and drawing on findings from an analysis of available media, including television and print news reportage, online communications, published histories and campaign material and other information produced by activists in HIV/AIDS and breast cancer communities, we argue that digital media have profoundly shaped how ‘activism’ is enacted, both the goals pursued and the strategies adopted, which serve to broadly align contemporary patient communities’ interests with those of science and business. This alignment, which we characterise as ‘bio-digital citizenship’, has involved a fundamental reorientation of ‘activism’ from less of a struggle for rights to more of a striving to achieve a public profile and attract funding. We conclude by calling for a reconceptualisation of ‘activism’ to more adequately reflect the workings of power in the digital age, whereby the agency and hopes of citizens are central to the workings of political rule.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Altman, D. (1994) Power and Community: Organizational and Cultural Responses to AIDS, London: Taylor & Francis.
- Andrejevic, M. (2014) 'The big data divide', International Journal of Communication, 8: 1673- 1689.
- Bailey, A. C. and Fisher, M. (2008) 'Current use of antiretroviral treatment', British Medical Bulletin, 87, 1: 175-192.
- Borneman, J. (1988) 'AIDS in the Two Berlins' in D. Crimp (ed.), AIDS: Cultural Analysis, Cultural Activism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Brown, N. (1998) Ordering Hope: Representations of Xenotransplantation: An Actor-Network Account. Ph.D. thesis. University of Lancaster: Lancaster.
- Diedrich, L. (2016) Indirect Action: Schizophrenia, Epilepsy, AIDS, and the Course of Health Activism, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Fuhrmans, V. (2002) 'How to Get New -but Unapproved -Drugs: Under Pressure, Companies Offer More Treatments For "Compassionate Use"', Wall Street Journal, 5 December.
- Gambardella, S. J. (2011) 'Absent Bodies: The AIDS Memorial Quilt as Social Melancholia', Journal of American Studies, 45, 2: 213-226.
- Gould, D. B. (2009) Moving politics: emotion and ACT UP's fight against AIDS, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Hardey, M. (2002) ' "The Story of my Illness": personal accounts of illness on the Internet', Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6, 1: 31-46.
- HealtheVoices™ (2018) 'HealtheVoices Conference: Empowering Online Advocates', https://www.healthevoices16.com. Accessed on January 12, 2018.
- King, S. (2004) 'Pink Ribbons Inc: breast cancer activism and the politics of philanthropy', International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17, 4: 473-492.
- Koay, P. P. and Sharp, R. R. (2013) 'The Role of Patient Advocacy Organizations in Shaping Genomic Science', The Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14: 579-595.
- Lanchester, J. (2017) 'You are the Product', London Review of Books, https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n16/john-lanchester/you-are-the-product. Accessed on January 12, 2018.
- Long, T. L. (2000) 'Plague of Pariahs: AIDS 'Zines and the Rhetoric of Transgression', Journal of Communication Inquiry, 24, 4: 401-411.
- Lupton, D. (2013) 'The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era', Social Theory and Health, 11: 256-270: doi 10.1057/sth.201? · DOI
- Mackey, T. K. and Schoenfeld, V. J. (2016) 'Going "social" to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access', BMC Medicine, 14: 17: DOI 10.1186/s12916-016-0568-8. · DOI
- McCoy, M. S., Carniol, M., Chockley, K., Urwin, J. W., Ezekiel, J., Emanuel, M. D and Schmidt, H. (2017) 'Conflicts of Interest for Patient-Advocacy Organizations', The New England Journal of Medicine, 376, 9: 880-885.
- McHenry, K. A. (2015) 'Breast cancer activism in the United States and the politics of genes', International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 8, 1: 182-200. https://med.nyu.edu/pophealth/divisions/medical-ethics/compassionate-use. Accessed on April 5, 2018.
- Petryna, A. (2002) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Pitts, V. (2004) 'Illness and Internet empowerment: writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace', Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 8, 1: 33-59.
- Potts, L. (2001) 'Lies, Damn Lies and Public Protection: Corporate Responsibility and Breast Cancer Activism', Journal of International Women's Studies, 2, 3: 1-11.
- Rose, N. (2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Rose, N. (2009) 'Normality and pathology in a biomedical age', The Sociological Review, 57: 66- 83.
- Selleck, L. G. (2010) 'Pretty in Pink: the Susan G. Komen Network and the Branding of the Breast Cancer Cause', Nordic Journal of English Studies, Special Issue: Popular Culture, 9, 3: 119-138.
- Tomes, N. and Hoffman, B. (2011) 'Introduction: Patients as Policy Actors', in B. Hoffman, N. Tomes, R. Grob and M. Schlesinger (eds), Patients as Policy Actors, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- United in Anger: A History of ACT UP (2012) Dir. Jim Hubbard. Van Dijck, J. and Poell, T. (2016) 'Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms', Big Data & Society, 1-11: DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173. · DOI
- Wachter, R. M. (1992) 'Aids, activism, and the politics of health', The New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 2: 128-133.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Cultivation of Digital Health Citizenship
Petrakaki, D., Hilberg, E., & Waring, J. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113675 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“This article contributes to health citizenship literature (Rose and Novas, 2004) by exploring the role of the digital (Petersen et al., 2018; Schermuly et al., 2020) in the production of health citizens.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Petersen, A., Schermuly, A. C., & Anderson, A.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schermuly, Allegra Clare
- Venue
- Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 478-494
- ISSN
- 1363-4593 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7196
- OpenAlex
- W2900013804
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pearl.plymouth.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP170100402)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- patient activism, digital media, biological citizenship, AIDS activism, breast cancer activism, patient communities
- MeSH terms
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics, Patient Participation, Politics, HIV Infections, Patient Rights, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review