Heterosexuality and 'the Labour of Love': A Contribution to Recent Debates on Female Sexual Dysfunction
Abstract
It is increasingly taken for granted that `successful heterosexuality' is contingent upon having a `normal' and `healthy' sex life. The recent popularity of the diagnostic label `Female Sexual Dysfunction' (FSD) is evidence that this social climate has fostered the (re)medicalization of women's sexual problems. In response to feminist concern over the growing use of the FSD label, this article considers data gathered as part of a qualitative, empirical study, examining women's perceptions of sexual difficulties and their treatment. It is argued that women with perceived sexual problems, regardless of whether or not they have been diagnosed with FSD, tend to engage in relationship based `sex work': the rationalization, improvement, and mastery of sex in their personal lives. Their decisions to take part in or resist sex work are closely connected to the discursive and material production of heterosexuality, gender inequalities and power differences amongst women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Taking charge of one's health is promoted as essential to good citizenship in modern societies, and sexual health is no exception.
“Taking charge of one's health is promoted as essential to good citizenship in modern societies (Rose, 2007b), and sexual health is no exception (Cacchioni, 2007; Tiefer, 1997).”
From Medicalization and the Refashioning of Age-Related Limits on Sexuality (2012) · cites this paper as Cacchioni, 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Medicalization and the Refashioning of Age-Related Limits on Sexuality
Marshall, B. L. (2012) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.644597 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Wentzell, E. (2017) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1259386 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cacchioni, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cacchioni, Thea
- ORCID
- Cacchioni, Thea
- Venue
- Sexualities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-320
- ISSN
- 1363-4607 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7382
- OpenAlex
- W2077575798
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sexualities (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- female sexual dysfunction, heterosexuality, medicalization of sexuality, women's sexual health, sex work, gender inequality, feminist criticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review