Understandings of depression among community members and primary healthcare attendees in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
Open accessAbstract
Available evidence in Africa suggests that the prevalence of depression in primary care settings is high but it often goes unrecognized. In this study, we explored how depression is conceptualized and communicated among community members and primary care attendees diagnosed with depression in rural Ethiopia with the view to informing the development of interventions to improve detection. We conducted individual interviews with purposively selected primary care attendees with depression (n = 28; 16 females and 12 males) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with males, females, and priests (n = 21) selected based on their knowledge of their community. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. None of the community members identified depression as a mental illness. They considered depressive symptoms presented in a vignette as part of a normal reaction to the stresses of life. They considered medical intervention only when the woman's condition in the vignette deteriorated and "affected her mind." In contrast, participants with depression talked about their condition as illness. Symptoms spontaneously reported by these participants only partially matched symptoms listed in the current diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders. In all participants' accounts, spiritual explanations and traditional healing were prominent. The severity of symptoms mediates the decision to seek medical help. Improved detection may require an understanding of local conceptualizations in order to negotiate an intervention that is acceptable to affected people.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The experiences and conceptualizations of depression and anxiety have been investigated in some countries of sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia, but not in the context of people with epilepsy.
“The experiences and conceptualizations of depression and anxiety have similarly been investigated in some countries of sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia, but not in the context of people with epilepsy [25, 26].”
From Experience and perceptions of mental ill-health in people with epilepsy in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
The Introduction and Abstract describe an investigation of how depression is conceptualized in rural Ethiopia, and the Methods identify community members and primary-care attendees diagnosed with depression as participants. The paper does not investigate anxiety or establish that comparable research has not been conducted among people with epilepsy; mentioning seizure disorders in participants’ discussions does not establish that research gap. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kleinman A. Anderson J. M. Finkler K. Frankenberg R. J. Young A. (1986). Social origins of distress and disease: Depression, neurasthenia, and pain in modern China. Current Anthropology, 24(5), 499– 509.
- World Health Organization. (2016). mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings: Mental health Gap action programme (mhGAP)–version 2.0. World Health Organization. 27786430
- Authors
- Tekola, B., Mayston, R., Eshetu, T., Birhane, R., Milkias, B., Hanlon, C., & Fekadu, A.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Addis Ababa University (ET)
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tekola, Bethlehem
- Venue
- Transcultural Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-12-23
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412-427
- ISSN
- 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7471
- PMC
- PMC10486165
- OpenAlex
- W3117760092
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- Medical Research Council and Department for International Development (MR/M025470/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- depression, primary care, rural Ethiopia, help-seeking, traditional healing, depressive symptoms, diagnostic criteria, stigma, mental health interventions, cultural context of illness
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Ethiopia, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Rural Population, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review