Cited by 10Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

Understandings of depression among community members and primary healthcare attendees in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

Open access
Tekola, Bethlehem, Mayston, Rosie, Eshetu, Tigist, Birhane, Rahel, Milkias, Barkot, Hanlon, Charlotte, Fekadu, Abebaw·2023·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

Available evidence in Africa suggests that the prevalence of depression in primary care settings is high but it often goes unrecognized. In this study, we explored how depression is conceptualized and communicated among community members and primary care attendees diagnosed with depression in rural Ethiopia with the view to informing the development of interventions to improve detection. We conducted individual interviews with purposively selected primary care attendees with depression (n = 28; 16 females and 12 males) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with males, females, and priests (n = 21) selected based on their knowledge of their community. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. None of the community members identified depression as a mental illness. They considered depressive symptoms presented in a vignette as part of a normal reaction to the stresses of life. They considered medical intervention only when the woman's condition in the vignette deteriorated and "affected her mind." In contrast, participants with depression talked about their condition as illness. Symptoms spontaneously reported by these participants only partially matched symptoms listed in the current diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders. In all participants' accounts, spiritual explanations and traditional healing were prominent. The severity of symptoms mediates the decision to seek medical help. Improved detection may require an understanding of local conceptualizations in order to negotiate an intervention that is acceptable to affected people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13634615211064367

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experiences and conceptualizations of depression and anxiety have been investigated in some countries of sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia, but not in the context of people with epilepsy.

    “The experiences and conceptualizations of depression and anxiety have similarly been investigated in some countries of sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia, but not in the context of people with epilepsy [25, 26].”

    From Experience and perceptions of mental ill-health in people with epilepsy in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction and Abstract describe an investigation of how depression is conceptualized in rural Ethiopia, and the Methods identify community members and primary-care attendees diagnosed with depression as participants. The paper does not investigate anxiety or establish that comparable research has not been conducted among people with epilepsy; mentioning seizure disorders in participants’ discussions does not establish that research gap. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kleinman A. Anderson J. M. Finkler K. Frankenberg R. J. Young A. (1986). Social origins of distress and disease: Depression, neurasthenia, and pain in modern China. Current Anthropology, 24(5), 499– 509.
  2. World Health Organization. (2016). mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings: Mental health Gap action programme (mhGAP)–version 2.0. World Health Organization. 27786430

Authors
Tekola, B., Mayston, R., Eshetu, T., Birhane, R., Milkias, B., Hanlon, C., & Fekadu, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
Corresponding author
Tekola, Bethlehem
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2021-12-23
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
412-427
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W3117760092
Cited by
10
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Medical Research Council and Department for International Development (MR/M025470/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
depression, primary care, rural Ethiopia, help-seeking, traditional healing, depressive symptoms, diagnostic criteria, stigma, mental health interventions, cultural context of illness
MeSH terms
Depression, Ethiopia, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Rural Population, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review