Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyIndian and Buddhist Studies

The roles and impacts of worldviews in the context of meditation-related challenges

Open access
Lindahl, Jared R., Palitsky, Roman, Cooper, David J., Britton, Willoughby B.·2023·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

Previous research has shown that worldviews can serve as a coping response to periods of difficulty or struggle, and worldviews can also change on account of difficulty. This paper investigates the impacts worldviews have on the nature and trajectory of meditation-related challenges, as well as how worldviews change or are impacted by such challenges. The context of meditation-related challenges provided by data from the Varieties of Contemplative Experience research project offers a unique insight into the dynamics between worldviews and meditation. Buddhist meditation practitioners and meditation experts interviewed for the study report how, for some, worldviews can serve as a risk factor impacting the onset and trajectory of meditation-related challenges, while, for others, worldviews (e.g., being given a worldview, applying a worldview, or changing a worldview) were reported as a remedy for mitigating challenging experiences and/or their associated distress. Buddhist meditation practitioners and teachers in the contemporary West are also situated in a cultural context in which religious and scientific worldviews and explanatory frameworks are dually available. Furthermore, the context of “Buddhist modernism” has also promoted a unique configuration in which the theory and practice of Buddhism is presented as being closely compatible with science. We identify and discuss the various impacts that religious and scientific worldviews have on meditation practitioners and meditation teachers who navigate periods of challenge associated with the practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13634615221128679

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Ahn J. (2021). Meditation sickness. In M. Farias, D. Brazier, & M. Lalljee (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of meditation (pp. 887– 906). Oxford University Press.
  2. Brown C. G. (2016). Can ‘secular’ mindfulness be separated from religion? In R. E. Purser, D. Forbes, & A. Burke (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: Culture, context, and social engagement (pp. 75– 94). Springer.
  3. Chun C.-A. Moos R. H. Cronkite R. C. (2006). Culture: A fundamental context for the stress and coping paradigm. In P. T. P. Wong & L. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 29– 53). Springer US. 10.1007/0-387-26238-5_2 · DOI
  4. Cook J. (2010). Meditation in modern Buddhism: Renunciation and change in Thai monastic life. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Dreyfus G. (2003). The sound of two hands clapping: The education of a Tibetan Buddhist monk. University of California Press.
  6. Edmondson D. Chaudoir S. R. Mills M. A. Park C. L. Holub J. Bartkowiak J. M. (2011). From shattered assumptions to weakened worldviews: Trauma symptoms signal anxiety buffer disruption. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16(4), 358– 385. 10.1080/15325024.2011.572030 24077677 PMC3783359 · DOI
  7. Ellison C. G. Lee J. (2010). Spiritual struggles and psychological distress: Is there a dark side of religion? Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 501– 517. 10.1007/s11205-009-9553-3 · DOI
  8. Exline J. J. (2013). Religious and spiritual struggles. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA Handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (vol. 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 459– 475). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/14045-025 · DOI
  9. Fenelon A. Danielsen S. (2016). Leaving my religion: Understanding the relationship between religious disaffiliation, health, and well-being. Social Science Research, 57, 49– 62. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.01.007 26973031 PMC4792192 · DOI
  10. Goldsmith R. E. Freyd J. J. DePrince A. P. (2011). Betrayal trauma: Associations with psychological and physical symptoms in young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(3), 547– 567. 10.1177/0886260511421672 21987504 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Greene E. M. (2021). The secrets of Buddhist meditation: Visionary meditation texts from early medieval China. University of Hawaii Press.
  12. Gullatte M. M. Brawley O. Kinney A. Powe B. Mooney K. (2010). Religiosity, spirituality, and cancer fatalism beliefs on delay in breast cancer diagnosis in African American women. Journal of Religion and Health, 49(1), 62– 72. 10.1007/s10943-008-9232-8 19184437 · DOI
  13. Jackson M. (2002). The politics of storytelling: Violence, transgression, and intersubjectivity. Museum Tusculanum Press.
  14. Janoff-Bulman R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7(2), 113– 136. 10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113 · DOI
  15. Jost J. T. Ledgerwood A. Hardin C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 171– 186. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00056.x · DOI
  16. Kleinman A. Das V. Lock M. M. (1997). Social suffering (1st ed.). University of California Press.
  17. Koltko-Rivera M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 3– 58. 10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3 · DOI
  18. Kvaale E. P. Haslam N. Gottdiener W. H. (2013). The ‘side effects’ of medicalization: A meta-analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 782– 794. 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.002 23831861 · DOI
  19. Lindahl J. R. (2017). Somatic energies and emotional traumas: A qualitative study of practice-related challenges reported by Vajrayāna Buddhists. Religions, 8(8), 153. 10.3390/rel8080153 · DOI
  20. Lindahl J. R. Britton W. B. Cooper D. J. (2022). Fear and terror in Buddhist meditation: A cognitive model for meditation-related changes in arousal and affect. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 7(1), 1–24. 10.1558/jch.22807 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lindahl J. R. Britton W. B. Cooper D. J. Kirmayer L. J. (2021). Challenging and adverse meditation experiences: Toward a person-centered approach. In M. Farias, D. Brazier, & M. Lalljee (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of meditation (pp. 841– 864). Oxford University Press.
  22. Lingpa D. (2015). The Vajra essence: Düdjom Lingpa’s visions of the great perfection (Vol. 3) (B. A. Wallace, Trans.). Wisdom Publications.
  23. Lopez D. S. (2008). Buddhism and science: A guide for the perplexed. University of Chicago Press.
  24. McAdams D. P. (2005). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
  25. McMahan D. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. Oxford University Press.
  26. McMahan D. (2011). Buddhism as the ‘religion of science’: From colonial Ceylon to the laboratories of Harvard. In J. R. Lewis & O. Hammer (Eds.), Handbook of religion and the authority of science (pp. 115– 140). Brill.
  27. O’Connor M.-F. (2003). Making meaning of life events: Theory, evidence, and research directions for an alternative model. OMEGA – Journal of Death and Dying, 46(1), 51– 75. 10.2190/0CKD-PVQ0-T260-NTXU · DOI
  28. Palinkas L. A. Aarons G. A. Horwitz S. Chamberlain P. Hurlburt M. Landsverk J. (2011). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 44– 53. 10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z 20967495 PMC3025112 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Palitsky R. Cooper D. J. Lindahl J. R. Britton W. B. (under review). Relationships between religious and scientific worldviews in the narratives of Western Buddhists reporting meditation-related challenges.
  30. Palitsky R. Sullivan D. Young I. F. Dong S. (2019). Worldviews and the construal of suffering from depression. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(4), 191– 208. 10.1002/jts5.46 · DOI
  31. Pargament K. I. Koenig H. G. Perez L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519– 543. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1 10775045 · DOI
  32. Park C. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 707– 729. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00428.x · DOI
  33. Pearce M. J. (2013). Addressing religion and spirituality in health care systems. In K. I. Pargament, A. Mahoney, & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), APA Handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (vol. 2): An applied psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 527– 541). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/14046-027 · DOI
  34. Shulman E. (2014). Rethinking the Buddha: Early Buddhist philosophy as meditative perception. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Stein A. (2016). Terror, love, and brainwashing: Attachment in cults and totalitarian systems. Routledge. 29280681
  36. Sullivan D. (2016). Cultural-existential psychology: The role of culture in suffering and threat. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Sullivan D. Palitsky R. Young I. F. (2018). The role of cultural beliefs and existential motivation in suffering perceptions. In B. T. Rutjens & M. J. Brandt (Eds.), Belief systems and the perception of reality (pp. 97– 114). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315114903-7 · DOI
  38. Taves A. Asprem E. Ihm E. (2018). Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 207– 217. 10.1037/rel0000201 · DOI
  39. Thompson E. (2020). Why I am not a Buddhist. Yale University Press.
  40. Tsongkhapa. (2002). The great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (Vol. 3) (The Lamrim Chenmo Translation Committee, Trans.). Snow Lion Publications.
  41. Wallace B. A. (2003). Introduction. In B. A. Wallace (Ed.), Buddhism and science: Breaking new ground (pp. 1– 29). Columbia University Press.

Authors
Lindahl, J. R., Palitsky, R., Cooper, D. J., & Britton, W. B.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Britton, Willoughby B.
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2022-12-07
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
637-650
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W4310964635
Cited by
14
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Research Network for the Study of Science and Belief in Society (Dynamics of Science and Religiosity in the context)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
worldview, Buddhist meditation, Buddhist modernism, religious worldview, scientific worldview, coping, worldview change, contemplative experience, distress, science and religion
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Buddhism, Humans, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review