A holistic approach to primary—secondary transitions
Abstract
A longitudinal study was conducted to follow children, in a city in Scotland, to understand their experiences of primary—secondary transition. The children were purposively selected as known to be having/potentially having problems with transition. Initial interviews were conducted with children, their parents and professionals when five were in the first year of secondary school, two in the second year of secondary school and two in the last year of primary school. Follow-up interviews were undertaken with six children again after six months when four were in the second year and two in the first year of the secondary school. Three out of the nine children were finding it difficult to deal with transition even at the follow-up. The issue of transition was complex, with considerable impact of a child's internal attributes, family, peers, school systems, professionals and community on his/her primary—secondary transition being successful or not.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that children with older siblings were more likely to have a negative transition may be due to an older sibling heightening their anxiety levels through 'horror stories' or the younger sibling being aware of their brother's or sister's negative primary-secondary transition experiences.
“This may be due to an older sibling heightening their anxiety levels through 'horror stories' (Reay & Lucey, 2000) or the younger sibling being aware of their brother's or sister's negative primary-secondary transition experiences (Jindal-Snape & Foggie, 2008).”
From Primary–secondary school transition experiences and factors associated with differences in these experiences: Analysis of the longitudinal Growing Up in Scotland dataset (2023) · cites this paper as Jindal-Snape & Foggie, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The transition from primary to secondary school: Teachers’ perspectives
Hopwood, B., Hay, I., & Dyment, J. (2016) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-016-0200-0 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Studies have reported that few schools have such linking and networking arrangements (Jindal-Snape and Foggie 2008; Woolley 2011) and this is something that should become a priority as movements are made in this space.”
BackgroundNeal, S., Rice, F., Ng‐Knight, T., Riglin, L., & Frederickson, N. (2016) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.04.003 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Kaur, T., McLoughlin, E., & Grimes, P. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00328-0 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Jindal‐Snape, D., Bradshaw, P., Gilbert, A., Smith, N., & Knudsen, L. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3444 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jindal-Snape, D., & Foggie, J.
- Affiliations
- School of Education, Social Work and Community Education University of Dundee, UK,
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Venue
- Improving Schools
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-18
- ISSN
- 1365-4802 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7583
- OpenAlex
- W2138825276
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Improving Schools (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Keywords
- transition to secondary school, peer influence, school system, educational professionals, longitudinal study of children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review