Siblings’ farewell to a stillborn sister or brother and parents’ support to their older children: a questionnaire study from the parents’ perspective
Abstract
This study aims to capture parental descriptions of how siblings take leave of and mourn a stillborn brother or sister and how their parents support them. Data were collected by questionnaires from 16 parents of siblings to a stillborn child one year after the stillbirth. Data were analysed numerically for the multiple-choice questions and content analysis was used for parental comments and descriptions. The results describe siblings’ farewell to a stillborn brother or sister and how their parents in the midst of their own grief were involved in supporting siblings’ wellbeing, and observed their mourning reactions. Although the findings need to be interpreted with caution, they may provide insight that enables staff to become more sensitive to the whole family experience in the practice of their profession. Further research into siblings’ grief and parental support after stillbirth is crucial so that further light may be shed on their situation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that higher grief was associated with more acknowledgement from family supports a family-centred approach to providing information and support for loss and grief.
“In line with research exploring the impact of pregnancy loss and neonatal death on extended family members including siblings and grandparents [97–101], this finding supports a family-centred approach to providing information and support for loss and grief, so that all family members involved in the experience of loss are better able to support one another.”
From Factors contributing to men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample (2021) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Erlandsson, K., Avelin, P., Säflund, K., Wredling, R., & Rådestad, I.
- Affiliations
- Mälardalen University (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Erlandsson, Kerstin
- ORCID
- Erlandsson, Kerstin
- Venue
- Journal of Child Health Care
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-160
- ISSN
- 1367-4935 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2889
- OpenAlex
- W2075150258
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Keywords
- stillbirth, loss of a sibling, mourning, parental grief, parental support, family bereavement, parents' perspective
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Bereavement, Child, Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Family Health, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Siblings, Stillbirth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review