CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social robots to support children’s well-being under medical treatment: A systematic state-of-the-art review

Moerman, Clara J, van der Heide, Loek, Heerink, Marcel·2019·Journal of Child Health Care
DOI 10.1177/1367493518803031
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Hospitalization is a stressful experience for children. Socially assistive robots (SARs), designed to interact with humans, might be a means to mitigate a child’s stress and support its well-being. A systematic state-of-the-art review was performed to inventorize the use of SARs in hospital to support children’s well-being and what the effects are. We searched five databases (Cinahl, Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, IEEE), combining terms for ‘distress’, ‘relaxation’ and ‘well-being’ with terms for social robot and child, and did an additional hand search. Ten publications (on eight studies) out of 563 unique titles were considered relevant. Six different robots were used (one humanoid, five pet-like) for distraction during medical procedure, emotional support for dealing with a disease or support of well-being during hospital stay. Positive effects on the children were noted, such as experiencing distraction and engagement, and less stress or pain, more relaxation, smiling and openness or better communication. On a psychiatric ward some youngsters felt unsafe with the robot. The outcomes suggest that SARs may have a potentially positive influence on a child’s well-being. Further research is needed to determine the effect of using SARs and how to integrate the use in the working routines of health personnel.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1367493518803031

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1007/s12369-015-0294-y · DOI
  2. Angulo C, 2012, Actas de XIV Jornados de ARCA Sistemas Cualitativos y sus Aplicaciones en Diagnosis, Robótica en Inteligencia Ambienta
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00591.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.056 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1359105313504794 · DOI
  7. 10.1515/9783110522143 · DOI
  8. Broekens J, 2009, Gerontology, 8, 94
  9. 10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s12369-016-0364-9 · DOI
  11. Carnevale FA, 2013, Dynamics (Spring), 24, 19
  12. 10.1177/1367493512451061 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.023 · DOI
  14. 10.2752/175303714X13837396326251 · DOI
  15. 10.1542/peds.2014-0556 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1367493506067884 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/pro0000177 · DOI
  18. Deci EL, 2002, Handbook of Self-Determination Research
  19. Duckworth D, 2015, Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI’15 Extended Abstracts, 13
  20. 10.1037/12301-009 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172290 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/2701973.2702028 · DOI
  23. Kimura R, 2004, The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) 2004 annual conference, 1, 475
  24. 10.1007/s12369-016-0365-8 · DOI
  25. Moerman C, Jansens R, Van der Heide L, et al. (2016) How to introduce a new technology into existing health care practices and evaluate its potential: experiences from the New Pals project. Paper presented on New Friends 2016, 2nd international conference on robots in therapy and education , 2–4 November 2016, Barcelona, Spain. Available at: http://www.marcelheerink.nl/pdf/AbstractNF16-NewPals.pdf (accessed 21 April 2017).
  26. Nakadoi Y, 2015, European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1, S281
  27. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0513 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3 · DOI
  30. Stinson JN, 2016, Pediatric Blood and Cancer, 63, S54
  31. 10.1145/2851581.2892409 · DOI
  32. Uman LS, 2013, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10
  33. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.011 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/WCICA.2002.1020792 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Moerman, C. J., van der Heide, L., & Heerink, M.
Affiliations
  • Robotics Research Group, Windesheim University for Applied Sciences, Almere, The Netherlands
  • Research Center for Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
ORCID
Moerman, Clara J
Venue
Journal of Child Health Care
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2018-11-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
596-612
ISSN
  • 1367-4935
  • 1741-2889
DOI
10.1177/1367493518803031
Cited by
90
References
2
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Funders
SIA-RAAK Public Program (2014-01-49P)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review