The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Sohn-Rethel in Naples. On plebeian creativity
Abstract
This article explores German philosopher Alfred Sohn-Rethel’s little-known reflections on Naples, to begin developing the notion of a plebeian creativity. Unlike capitalist notions of innovation that reinforce the division between intellectual and manual labour, Sohn-Rethel suggested that the Neapolitan approach to technology consisted in reclaiming mostly broken technological artefacts within the context of an lived economy of use values. We suggest that the particular historical structure of Naples makes the city a privileged observatory of a similar baroque approach to technology and innovation as bazaar economies are expanding across the world. We propose that this takes part in an expanding neo-plebeian provisioning system: catering to the needs and desires of those who have been sucked in by industrial modernity to, subsequently, find themselves spat out into precarity, and in so doing ignoring the normative framework and sumptuary laws of mainstream consumer capitalism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Beebe B (2013) Shanzhai, sumptuary law, and intellectual property law in contemporary China. UCDL Rev 47: 849.
- Benjamin W, Lacis A (1991) ‘Neapel’. In: von Tillman R (ed.) Walter Benjamin. Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, pp.307–314.
- Brancaccio L (2017) I Clan Di Camorra. Milano: Donzelli.
- Burke P (1979) Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. London: E. Smith.
- 10.1179/007516307X227659 · DOI
- Chatterjee P (2011) Lineages of Political Society: Studies in Postcolonial Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Clover J (2019) Riot. Strike. Riot. London: Verso Books.
- 10.4324/9781003086000 · DOI
- Custoza S (ed.) (1991) Napoli. La Filosofia Del Rotto. Napoli: Alessandra Carola Editrice.
- 10.1515/9781503636019 · DOI
- Echeverria B (1998) La Modernidad De Lo Barocco. Mexico City: UNAM.
- Ferrari-Bravo L, Serafini A (1977) Stato E Sottosviluppo: Il Caso Del Mezzogiorno Italiano. Milano: Feltrinelli.
- Gago V (2014) La Razón Neoliberal. Economías Barrocas Y Pragmática Popular. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limon.
- 10.1017/S0018246X02002571 · DOI
- Hardt M, Negri A (2004) Multitude. New York: Penguin.
- 10.22492/ijmcf.5.1.02 · DOI
- 10.1177/01634437231209203 · DOI
- Linebaugh P, Rediker; (2000) The Many-headed Hydra. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- 10.4324/9780203106006 · DOI
- 10.1177/1463499617735257 · DOI
- Mittelmeier M (2024) Naples 1925. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- 10.1215/9781478009023 · DOI
- Petrillo A (2011) Napoli globale: Discorsi, territorio e potere nella ‘città plebea’. In: Petrillo A (ed.) La rivoluzione liberista nelle città euro-mediterranee. Milano: Mesogea, pp.45–70.
- Petrulli P, Vettoretto L (2022) Neoplebe, Classe Creativa, Élite. La Nuova Italia. Bari: Laterza.
- Ruda F (2011) Hegel's Rabble: An Investigation into Hegel's Philosophy of Right. London: Continuum Books.
- Simone A (2022) The Surrounds: Urban Life Within and Beyond Capture. Duke University Press.
- Sohn-Rethel A (1990) Das Ideal Des Kaputten- Uber Neapolitanische Technik. Bremen: Verlag Bettina Wassman.
- 10.1080/09528829908576796 · DOI
- 10.1353/jsh/7.4.382 · DOI
- 10.1080/03071027808567424 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1057/cpt.2011.25 · DOI
- 10.1093/past/108.1.117 · DOI
- Villari R (2012) Un Sogno Di Libertà. Milano: Mondadori.
Metadata
- Authors
- Arvidsson, A., Luise, V., & Recano, L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cultural Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-05-02
- ISSN
- 1367-5494
- 1460-3551
- Cited by
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- MUR-Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2022 SH3-2022BCEY22)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sohn-Rethel in Naples. On plebeian creativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/13675494251336604
- The paper
- Arvidsson, A., Luise, V., & Recano, L. (2025). Sohn-Rethel in Naples. On plebeian creativity. European Journal of Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494251336604
