Cited by 42Cultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFoucault, Power, and EthicsChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance

Be creative for the state: Creative workers in Chinese state-owned cultural enterprises

Open access
Lin, Jian·2019·International Journal of Cultural Studies

Abstract

This article studies creative labour in Chinese state-owned cultural enterprises (SOCEs). Based on the empirical analysis of fieldwork data, it analyses the governmentality of creative labour in Chinese SOCEs through an investigation of the condition of autonomy and the discourse of self-realization within selected Chinese media companies. The autonomy of creative work within the system is made contingent by the party state’s ideological concern, while since the commercialization reform of SOCEs, creative workers are also expected to ‘be creative for the state’ under the discourse of self-realization. In practice, as the case of loafing on the job illustrates, the system causes marked contradictions that furnish creative individuals with possibilities to distance themselves from the expected subjectivity of ‘being creative for the state’. This article offers an exemplary case study of how the governance of creativity and creative labour works in Chinese SOCEs, and of how it distinguishes itself from the creativity dispositif in the West. It suggests that the theorization of creative labour needs to go beyond the western neoliberal perspective and take into account the diversity of socio-political contexts across the world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1367877917750670

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wanghong, Chinese creative workers, form a growing group that participates actively and wants stable pay.

    “Chinese creative workers ('Wanghong') are a socially growing group, with active participation and a desire for stable remuneration (Lin, 2018), showcasing real life in different regions with the help of platform affordances (Craig et al., 2021).”

    From ‘Traffic rewards’, ‘algorithmic visibility’, and ‘advertiser satisfaction’: How Chinese short-video platforms cultivate creators in stages (2024) · cites this paper as Lin, 2018

    The introductory discussion (International Journal of Cultural Studies 00(0), page unavailable) says secure state-company jobs attract Chinese creative workers in precarious cultural industries. That lends limited support to an interest in stable employment, but the paper concerns workers in state-owned cultural enterprises; it does not identify them as Wanghong or establish that Wanghong are a growing, actively participating group seeking stable pay. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Banks M (2007) The Politics of Cultural Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Banks M (2010) Autonomy guaranteed? Cultural work and the 'art-commerce relation'. Journal for Cultural Research 14(3): 251-269.
  3. Banks M, Gill R and Taylor S (2013) Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries. Abingdon: Routledge.
  4. Benson J and Zhu Y (1999) Markets, firms and workers in Chinese state-owned enterprises. Human Resource Management Journal 9(4): 58-74.
  5. Chan KW and Buckingham W (2008) Is China abolishing the hukou system? China Quarterly 195: 582-606.
  6. Chow YF (2011) Hope against hopes: Diana Zhu and the transnational politics of Chinese popular music. Cultural Studies 25(6): 783-808.
  7. Chow YF (2017) Hong Kong creative workers in mainland China: the aspirational, the precarious, and the ethical. China Information 31(1): 43-62.
  8. Curtin M and Sanson K (eds) Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  9. Friedman A (1977) Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  10. Fu C (2014) System reform of state-owned cultural enterprises: from supervisor-oriented system to sponsor-oriented system (Chinese). Journal of Central China Normal University (social science) 3: 61-67.
  11. Fung A (2016) Redefining creative labor: East Asian comparisons. In: M Curtin and K Sanson (eds) Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp. 200-214.
  12. Fung A and Zhang X (2011) The Chinese Ugly Betty: TV cloning and local modernity. International Journal of Cultural Studies 14(3): 265-276.
  13. Harvey D (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
  14. Hay D, Morris D, Liu G and Yao S (1994) Economic Reform and State-owned Enterprises in China 1979-87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU.
  15. Hesmondhalgh D (2010) Normativity and social justice in the analysis of creative labour. Journal for Cultural Research 14(3): 231-249.
  16. Hesmondhalgh D and Baker S (2011) Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. Abingdon: Routledge.
  17. Holt F and Lapenta F (2010) Introduction: Autonomy and creative labour. Journal for Cultural Research 14(3): 223-229.
  18. Howkins J (2002) The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  19. Keane M (2013) Creative industries in China: Art, Design and Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  20. Lee D (2011) Networks, cultural capital and creative labour in the British independent television industry. Media, Culture & Society 33(4): 549-565.
  21. McGuigan J (2004) Rethinking Cultural Policy. Maidenhead, Berks: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  22. McRobbie A (2016) Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  23. Nixon S and Crewe B (2004) Pleasure at work? Gender, consumption and work-based identities in the creative industries. Consumption Markets & Culture 7(2): 129-147.
  24. Nonini DM (2008) Is China becoming neoliberal? Critique of Anthropology 28(2): 145-176.
  25. Qian Z (2006) Fortress Besieged. Vancouver: Penguin Books.
  26. Rose N, O'Malley P and Valverde M (2006) Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1): 83-104.
  27. Ursell G (2000) Television production: issues of exploitation, commodification and subjectivity in UK television labour markets. Media, Culture & Society 22(6): 805-825.
  28. Wang J (2001) The state question in Chinese popular cultural studies. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 2(1): 35-52.
  29. Wang L (2006) Analyzing the Dynamics between Organizational Culture and Change: A Case Study of China Central Television (CCTV) in Transition. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
  30. Wang W (2011) Communication as Labour (zuowei laodong de chuanbo). Beijing: Press of Chinese Communication University.
  31. Xing F (1995) The Chinese cultural system: implications for cross-cultural management. SAM Advanced Management Journal 60(1): 14.
  32. Yan H (2003) Neoliberal governmentality and neohumanism: organizing suzhi/value flow through labor recruitment networks. Cultural Anthropology 18(4): 493-523.
  33. Zhu Y (2012) Two Billion Eyes: The Story of China Central Television. New York: The New Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, J.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lin, Jian
Venue
International Journal of Cultural Studies
Published
2018-01-09
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
53-69
ISSN
  • 1367-8779 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-356X
OpenAlex
W2783630220
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cultural Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Keywords
creative labour, governmentality, autonomy, self-realization, media companies, neoliberalism, Chinese cultural policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review