Cited by 73Social and Intergroup PsychologyMental Health Treatment and AccessInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Modern avenues for intergroup contact: Using E-contact and intergroup emotions to reduce stereotyping and social distancing against people with schizophrenia

Maunder, Rachel D., White, Fiona A., Verrelli, Stefano·2019·Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Abstract

Intergroup contact is the leading strategy for reducing the stigma associated with mental illness. For the first time, the current study examines the effectiveness of a contemporary intergroup contact strategy, called electronic or E-contact, to reduce stigma against people diagnosed with schizophrenia. It also examines the mediating role of three target-relevant intergroup emotions, namely fear, anger, and pity. In total, 133 participants engaged in E-contact with a person diagnosed with schizophrenia (intergroup E-contact), E-contact with a person without a mental illness (intragroup E-contact), or no contact. Compared to the intragroup E-contact and no-contact conditions, intergroup E-contact reduced fear, anger, and stereotyping toward people with schizophrenia. Additionally, fear and anger, but not pity, were found to be significant affective mediators of the E-contact effect. The findings demonstrate the value of computer-mediated intergroup contact for stigma reduction, and emphasize the importance of intergroup emotions in this domain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1368430218794873

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 73

Authors
Maunder, R. D., White, F. A., & Verrelli, S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Maunder, Rachel D.
Venue
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2018-09-19
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
947-963
ISSN
  • 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7188
OpenAlex
W2889654492
Cited by
73
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
intergroup contact, electronic contacts, computer-mediated communication, schizophrenia, mental health stigma, stereotyping, intergroup emotions, fear, anger, pity, social distancing, stigma reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review