Cited by 189Gender and Feminist StudiesGender Roles and Identity StudiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Gender inequalities during COVID-19

Open access
Fisher, Alexandra N., Ryan, Michelle K.·2021·Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Abstract

The onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic put a halt to progress toward gender equality and, instead, exacerbated existing gender inequalities across domains—from gendered divisions of labour to economic stability. In this paper we document some of the most glaring gender inequalities that have arisen in the COVID-19 pandemic and discuss how social psychological theories and research—including work on gender stereotypes and roles, responses to threat, precarious masculinity, perceptions of risk, and backlash—can help to explain the roots of these inequalities. In doing so, we use a broad definition of gender and consider relevant intersections of identity. Finally, we present three key considerations for research on gender inequalities moving forward. Namely, the need for social psychologists to (a) challenge binary conceptualizations of gender, (b) broaden the focus of research on gender inequalities, and (c) adopt an intersectional lens to address systemic inequalities in the wake of COVID-19.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1368430220984248

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 189

Authors
Fisher, A. N., & Ryan, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Alexandra N.
Venue
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2021-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
237-245
ISSN
  • 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7188
OpenAlex
W3133881017
Cited by
189
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 20
FWCI
51.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (725128)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
gender inequality, COVID-19 pandemic, gender stereotypes, gender roles, threat response, risk perception, backlash, intersectionality, economic stability, division of labor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review