Optimal wireless sensor network configuration for structural monitoring using automatic-learning firefly algorithm
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks are becoming attractive data communication patterns in structural health monitoring systems. Designing and applying effective wireless sensor network–based structural health monitoring systems for large-scale civil infrastructure require a great number of wireless sensors and the optimal wireless sensor networks configuration becomes critical for such spatially separated large structures. In this article, optimal wireless sensor network configuration for structural health monitoring is treated as a discrete optimization problem, where parameter identification and network performance are simultaneously addressed. To solve this rather complicated optimization problem, a novel swarm intelligence algorithm called the automatic-learning firefly algorithm is proposed by integrating the original firefly algorithm with the Lévy flight and the automatic-learning mechanism. In the proposed algorithm, the Lévy flight is adopted to maximize the searching capability in unknown solution space and avoid premature convergence and the automatic-learning mechanism is designed to drive fireflies to move toward better locations at high speed. Numerical experiments are performed on a long-span bridge to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed automatic-learning firefly algorithm. Results indicate that automatic-learning firefly algorithm can find satisfactory wireless sensor network configurations, which facilitate easy discrimination of identified mode vectors and long wireless sensor network lifetime, and the innovations in automatic-learning firefly algorithm make it superior to the simple discrete firefly algorithm as to solution quality and convergence speed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security
Madamanchi, S. R. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.72773 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhou, G.-D., Xie, M.-X., Yi, T.-H., & Li, H.-N.
- Affiliations
- Hohai University (CN)
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Guang-Dong
- Venue
- Advances in Structural Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-10-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 907-918
- ISSN
- 1369-4332 (ISSN-L)
- 2048-4011
- OpenAlex
- W2894813205
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Structural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- 973 Program (2015CB060000)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51625802, 51678218)
- Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province (BK20170097)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- structural health monitoring, firefly algorithm, Lévy flight, swarm intelligence, discrete optimization, parameter estimation, long-span bridges, sensor network lifetime, civil infrastructure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review