An analysis of the caregiver’s burden and the" breaking-point" when home care becomes inadequate
Abstract
The burden of caregivers of patients suffering from of Alzheimer type dementia (DAT) and vascular dementia (VD) was analysed at the critical time, the "breaking-point", when home care becomes insufficient and/or inadequate and the caregiver burden has probably reached its upper limit. Primary family caregivers of 39 DAT and 40 VD patients who were being considered for relocation into group-living units were studied. Total caregiving burden and different aspects of the burden: general strain, isolation, disappointment, and emotional involvement, were correlated with the patients' diagnoses, abilities, and symptoms. Closer kinship to the patient imposed a heavier burden. The caregiver's gender, social class, and previous institutionalization of the patient did not influence the caregiver burden. There was no significant correlation between the patients' ADL ability or cognition and the burden. A higher level of disappointment was found among the VD carers. Different symptomatology in patients of the two diagnostic groups was related to special aspects of the burden. Multiple regression analysis showed that the amount of caregiving time each week and impaired sense of own identity, misidentifications, clinical fluctuations, and nocturnal deterioration in the patients predicted the breaking-point.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Access to formal home care can support caregivers in managing daily challenges of providing care for persons living with dementia and can delay entry into long-term care.
“Access to formal home care can support caregivers in their role in helping to manage the daily challenges of providing care for persons living with dementia, care, can even delay entry into long-term care (LTC) [10,11].”
From Towards defining quality in home care for persons living with dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Annerstedt, L., ElmstÅhl, S., Ingvad, B., & Samuelsson, S.-M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Community Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine
- Lund University (SE)
- ORCID
- ElmstÅhl, Sölve
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1905
- OpenAlex
- W2091311468
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, breaking point, home care, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, family caregivers, group living, disappointment, caregiver isolation, caregiver identity, caregiving time, kinship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Home Nursing, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Sweden, Dementia, Vascular, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review