Cited by 42Cardiac Health and Mental HealthMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

How important are individual counselling, expectancy beliefs and autonomy for the maintenance of exercise after cardiac rehabilitation?

Mildestvedt, Thomas, Meland, Eivind, Eide, Geir Egil·2008·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aims: We examined whether autonomy supportive and self-efficacy enhancing individual lifestyle counselling was associated with improved maintenance of exercise and physical capacity compared with group based counselling. We also tested whether self-efficacy beliefs and autonomous motivation was associated with improved maintenance of exercise over time. Methods: Randomised controlled trial and longitudinal study of predictor variables. One hundred and seventy six (38 female) patients mainly with coronary heart disease were randomized to either have standard group based rehabilitation or to additionally receive the intervention. Patients were recruited from a 4-week cardiac rehabilitation programme with two years follow-up at Krokeide Centre in Bergen, Norway. Results: We found no statistically significant between-group differences. The groups showed an overall improvement of their self-evaluated physical capacity during the two years of the study, corresponding 7% change of score (p<0.001). The composite exercise score improved 6% during follow-up (p<0.001). Intensity of exercise activities improved 17% from inclusion to 24 months' follow-up (p<0.001). Self-efficacy for increased exercise, general expectancy and autonomous motivation were significant predictors of increased exercise and physical capacity. Controlled motivation hampered physical capacity improvement. Conclusions: Among this self-selected and motivated group of rehabilitation patients we found no additional effect of adding individual counselling to group-based interventions. Based on longitudinal documentation this cardiac rehabilitation programme improves long-term maintenance of exercise and physical capacity and this maintenance is related to autonomous motivation, general expectancy and self-efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494808090633

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mildestvedt, T., Meland, E., & Eide, G. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Mildestvedt, Thomas
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2008-11
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
832-840
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2035070175
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cardiac rehabilitation, exercise maintenance, autonomy support, self-efficacy, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, expectancy beliefs, physical capacity, coronary artery disease, exercise intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Coronary Disease, Counseling, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Prognosis, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Exercise, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Self Efficacy, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review