How important are individual counselling, expectancy beliefs and autonomy for the maintenance of exercise after cardiac rehabilitation?
Abstract
Aims: We examined whether autonomy supportive and self-efficacy enhancing individual lifestyle counselling was associated with improved maintenance of exercise and physical capacity compared with group based counselling. We also tested whether self-efficacy beliefs and autonomous motivation was associated with improved maintenance of exercise over time. Methods: Randomised controlled trial and longitudinal study of predictor variables. One hundred and seventy six (38 female) patients mainly with coronary heart disease were randomized to either have standard group based rehabilitation or to additionally receive the intervention. Patients were recruited from a 4-week cardiac rehabilitation programme with two years follow-up at Krokeide Centre in Bergen, Norway. Results: We found no statistically significant between-group differences. The groups showed an overall improvement of their self-evaluated physical capacity during the two years of the study, corresponding 7% change of score (p<0.001). The composite exercise score improved 6% during follow-up (p<0.001). Intensity of exercise activities improved 17% from inclusion to 24 months' follow-up (p<0.001). Self-efficacy for increased exercise, general expectancy and autonomous motivation were significant predictors of increased exercise and physical capacity. Controlled motivation hampered physical capacity improvement. Conclusions: Among this self-selected and motivated group of rehabilitation patients we found no additional effect of adding individual counselling to group-based interventions. Based on longitudinal documentation this cardiac rehabilitation programme improves long-term maintenance of exercise and physical capacity and this maintenance is related to autonomous motivation, general expectancy and self-efficacy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 3 studies that analyzed identified regulations, no significant association emerged.
“In 3 studies that analyzed identified regulations [36,40,39], no significant association emerged.”
From Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review (2012) · cites this paper as [36]
Cites
A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients.
Dusseldorp, E., van Elderen, T., Maes, S., Meulman, J., & Kraaij, V. (1999) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.506 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review
Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 · Cited by 2,963 · see citing works
“Gender differences Kwan et al., 2011[53] Prospective (4 wk) 104 (58) Undergraduate students; active (Mean 18.2 yr) USA Exercise causality orientations (ECOS) BIV: Autonomy O. (+), Controlling O. (−), and Impersonal O. (n.s.) Self-reported exercise (online diary) Bivariate correlations VI. SDT-based Interventions and o…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNtoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Lonsdale, C., & Williams, G. C. (2021) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mildestvedt, T., Meland, E., & Eide, G. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Mildestvedt, Thomas
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 832-840
- ISSN
- 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1905
- OpenAlex
- W2035070175
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- cardiac rehabilitation, exercise maintenance, autonomy support, self-efficacy, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, expectancy beliefs, physical capacity, coronary artery disease, exercise intensity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Coronary Disease, Counseling, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Prognosis, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Exercise, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Self Efficacy, Secondary Prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review