Snus use during the life-course and risk of the metabolic syndrome and its components
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to investigate the association between life-course exposure to snus and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its components in adulthood. Design and method: Tobacco habits at baseline (age 16) and three follow-ups (ages 21, 30 and 43) were assessed among 880 participants in a population-based cohort in Northern Sweden. Presence of the metabolic syndrome at age 43 was ascertained using the International Diabetes Federation criteria. Odds ratios and CIs for risk of the metabolic syndrome and its components by snus use at 16, 21, 30 and 43 years were calculated using logistic regression. Cumulative snus use was defined as number of life periods (1–4) with current snus use. Results: At age 43, 164 participants (18.6%) were current snus users. We found no association between exclusive snus use at the ages of 16, 21, 30 and 43 years and the metabolic syndrome at age 43 years. Snus use (among non-smokers) was associated with raised triglycerides and high blood pressure in crude analysis, but not in multivariable models. There was no association between cumulative snus use and risk of the metabolic syndrome. Cumulative snus use was associated with central obesity, raised triglycerides and impaired fasting glucose/diabetes mellitus type 2 in crude analyses, but not after adjustments. Conclusions: The health consequences of snus exposure from adolescence to mid-adulthood do not seem to include increased risk of the metabolic syndrome or its components. The cardio-metabolic risk of dual exposure to snus and cigarettes may warrant further attention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a positive association between exclusive snus use and impaired fasting glucose of diabetes type 2 at age 21 (OR = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.12-4.32).
“A positive association between exclusive snus use and impaired fasting glucose of diabetes type 2 at age 21 (OR = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.12-4.32)(Byhamre et al. 2017)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Byhamre et al. 2017
Exclusive use of snus is not associated with metabolic syndrome at ages 16, 21, 30, and 43; it is positively associated with increased triglycerides at ages 16, 21, and 30, high blood pressure at ages 21, 30, and 43, and impaired fasting glucose at age 21.
“no association between exclusive use of snus and the metabolic syndrome at age 16, 21, 30 and 43 years-old.Moreover, there was a positive association between exclusive use of snus and an increase in triglycerides level at age 16 (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.11-3.01),21 (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.11-3.79)and 30 (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.20-4.06)year-olds (for crude model).In addition, there was a positive”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Byhamre et al. 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Byhamre, M. L., Blankenberg, S., Dahlqvist, P., Eriksson, M., Oskarsson, V., Söderberg, S., Zeller, T., & Wennberg, P. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/00365513.2026.2647283
Self-citationKopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Byhamre, M. L., Gustafsson, P. E., Jansson, J.-H., Wennberg, M., Hammarström, A., & Wennberg, P.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-07-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 733-740
- ISSN
- 1403-4948
- 1651-1905
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (259-2012-37)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review