Smokeless tobacco (snus) use and colorectal cancer incidence and survival: Results from nine pooled cohorts
Abstract
Aims: Although smoking is considered to be an established risk factor for colorectal cancer, the current evidence on the association between smokeless tobacco and colorectal cancer is scant and inconclusive. We used pooled individual data from the Swedish Collaboration on Health Effects of Snus Use to assess this association. Methods: A total of 417,872 male participants from nine cohort studies across Sweden were followed up for incidence of colorectal cancer and death. Outcomes were ascertained through linkage to health registers. We used shared frailty models with random effects at the study level to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: During 7,135,504 person-years of observation, 4170 men developed colorectal cancer. There was no clear association between snus use and colorectal cancer overall. Exclusive current snus users, however, had an increased risk of rectal cancer (HR 1.40: 95% CI 1.09, 1.79). There were no statistically significant associations between snus use and either all-cause or colorectal cancer-specific mortality after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Our findings, from a large sample, do not support any strong relationships between snus use and colorectal cancer risk and survival among men. However, the observed increased risk of rectal cancer is noteworthy, and in merit of further attention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among exclusive current snus users compared to never-users, there is an increased risk of rectal cancer (HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.09-1.79).
“Increased risk of rectal cancer (HR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.09-1.79) in exclusive current snus users compared to never-users (Araghi et al. 2017a)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Araghi et al. 2017a
There is no association between snus use and colorectal cancer.
“No association between snus use and colorectal cancer (Araghi et al. 2017a)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Araghi et al. 2017a
Cites
The Västerbotten Intervention Programme: background, design and implications
Norberg, M., Wall, S., Boman, K., & Weinehall, L. (2010) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.4643 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Byhamre, M. L., Blankenberg, S., Dahlqvist, P., Eriksson, M., Oskarsson, V., Söderberg, S., Zeller, T., & Wennberg, P. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/00365513.2026.2647283
Self-citationKopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Araghi, M., Galanti, M. R., Lundberg, M., Liu, Z., Ye, W., Lager, A., Engström, G., Manjer, J., Alfredsson, L., Knutsson, A., Norberg, M., Palmqvist, R., Gylling, B., Wennberg, P., Lagerros, Y. T., Bellocco, R., Pedersen, N. L., Östergren, P.-O., & Magnusson, C.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-10-10
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 741-748
- ISSN
- 1403-4948
- 1651-1905
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review