Cited by 12

Smokeless tobacco (snus) use and colorectal cancer incidence and survival: Results from nine pooled cohorts

Araghi, Marzieh, Galanti, Maria Rosaria, Lundberg, Michael, Liu, Zhiwei, Ye, Weimin, Lager, Anton, Engström, Gunnar, Manjer, Jonas +11 more·2017·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aims: Although smoking is considered to be an established risk factor for colorectal cancer, the current evidence on the association between smokeless tobacco and colorectal cancer is scant and inconclusive. We used pooled individual data from the Swedish Collaboration on Health Effects of Snus Use to assess this association. Methods: A total of 417,872 male participants from nine cohort studies across Sweden were followed up for incidence of colorectal cancer and death. Outcomes were ascertained through linkage to health registers. We used shared frailty models with random effects at the study level to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: During 7,135,504 person-years of observation, 4170 men developed colorectal cancer. There was no clear association between snus use and colorectal cancer overall. Exclusive current snus users, however, had an increased risk of rectal cancer (HR 1.40: 95% CI 1.09, 1.79). There were no statistically significant associations between snus use and either all-cause or colorectal cancer-specific mortality after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Our findings, from a large sample, do not support any strong relationships between snus use and colorectal cancer risk and survival among men. However, the observed increased risk of rectal cancer is noteworthy, and in merit of further attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494817714191

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Araghi, M., Galanti, M. R., Lundberg, M., Liu, Z., Ye, W., Lager, A., Engström, G., Manjer, J., Alfredsson, L., Knutsson, A., Norberg, M., Palmqvist, R., Gylling, B., Wennberg, P., Lagerros, Y. T., Bellocco, R., Pedersen, N. L., Östergren, P.-O., & Magnusson, C.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
741-748
ISSN
  • 1403-4948
  • 1651-1905
Cited by
12
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review