How to apply the evidence-based recommendations for greater health equity into policymaking and action at the local level?
Open accessAbstract
In 2014, the regional commission for equity in health in the Swedish region of Östergötland, the Östgötacommission, presented their scientific report on health inequities and possible explanatory factors in the region as well as evidence-based recommendations to reduce health disparities. The final report with its 66 recommendations was officially approved by politicians across parties in the region. In the next step, out of the 66 recommendations, 10 areas of action were politically prioritized and declared in a common letter of intent signed by representatives from the municipalities and the Region of Östergötland. Now, these evidence-based recommendations and political areas of action are to be applied into policymaking and action at the local level. In this paper, this transferral process is reflected upon with the local example of the Norrköping municipality and their work with social investments. It is suggested to start with follow-up and evaluation of local action from the perspective of proportionate universalism, followed by local processes based on the organization model described here and earlier used at the regional level.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [2]2. Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England post- 2010. Fair society, healthy lives: The Marmot review. London 2012. http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/ resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot- review
- [6]6. Svensson L and Brulin G. Lärande som drivkraft och för utveckling. In: Henrik Kock, editor. Lärande i arbetslivet: möjligheter och utmaningar. Linköping: Linköping Univer- sity Electronic Press; 2014. pp. 279-82. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-110874 (accessed 4 October 2017).
- [7]7. Kristenson M and Larsson A. Arbete för jämlik hälsa -en interaktiv process. Erfarenheter från Östgötakommissionen. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 2016;93(5):529-540. Available from: http://socialmedicinsktidskrift.se/index.php/smt/arti- cle/view/1441
- [12]12. Hultkrantz L and Vimefall E. Social investment funds in Sweden: Status and design issues. Scand J Publ Adm 2017;21(3):85-107.
- [13]13. Källbom L. norrköpings sociala investeringsfond. Social- medicinsk Tidskrift 2014; 91(3): 253-260. Available from: http://www.socialmedicinsktidskrift.se/smt/index.php/smt/ article/view/1114
- [14]14. Bokström T, Lindencrona F and Wieselgren I-M. Sociale investeringar från dröm till verklighet Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 2014;93(3):245-52. Available from: http://www. socialmedicinsktidskrift.se/index.php/smt/article/view/1205
- [27]27. Diderichsen F. Health inequalities -a challenge for the social investment welfare state. Nordic Welfare Res 2016;1(1):43-54.
- Authors
- Van Vliet, J.
- Affiliations
- Public Health Controller, Norrköping municipality, Norrköping, Sweden
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 22_suppl
- Pages
- 28-36
- ISSN
- 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1905
- OpenAlex
- W2805444760
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- health equity, health disparities, evidence-based recommendations, local decision-making, Östergötland, Norrköping municipality, social investment, proportionate universalism, follow-up and evaluation, organizational models, health policy transfer
- MeSH terms
- Health Equity, Health Policy, Humans, Local Government, Policy Making, Sweden, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review