The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model
Open accessAbstract
The study attempts to unify prior research and develop a comprehensive, empirically based conceptual model of the barriers to EHR adoption among community physicians. The model uses concept mapping, which taps the shared expertise of a group and provides reliable estimates with relatively small sample sizes. The methodology includes brainstorming of barrier statements and sorting and rating of issue statements. The model illuminates the larger structure of barriers as well as the finer details of constituent issues. Core issues are standardization and interoperability; also important are technical issues and the cost—benefit of adopting EHRs. However, psychosocial issues, the main focus of diffusion research, seem relatively peripheral. We believe the development of this model is an important first step in creating effective and measurable interventions that enhance the adoption of EHRs in healthcare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to the results of these studies, different eHealth adoption factors may have led to difficulty for decision makers to explicitly understand, measure, and decrease inhibiting factors or enhance facilitating forces [9].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“A broad spectrum of research methodologies have been used to study eHealth adoption and acceptance factors based on information provided in published studies [9].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Everitt, B. J., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (1974) · Cited by 9,186
An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation
Trochim, W. M. K. (1989) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5 · Cited by 1,512
2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)
(2016) · doi:10.1109/hicss38599.2016 · Cited by 630
Factors and Forces Affecting EHR System Adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI Discussion
Ash, J. S. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1684 · Cited by 411
The Barriers to Electronic Medical Record Systems and How to Overcome Them
McDonald, C. J. (1997) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1997.0040213 · Cited by 378
Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians
Chismar, W. G., & Wiley-Patton, S. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2003.1174354 · Cited by 302
Computerized Physician Order Entry in U.S. Hospitals: Results of a 2002 Survey
Ash, J. S. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1427 · Cited by 294
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Annual HIMSS Conference and Exhibition 2002
- Taylor H., 2002, Harris Interactive Health Care News, 2, 1
- Burt C. W. H. E., 2005, Advanced Data, 353, 1
- Wallis K, 2006, Technology and Health Information Privacy: Consumers and the Adoption of Digital Medical Records Technology
- Chismar W.G., In 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 · Cited by 851
Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review
Li, J., Talaei-Khoei, A., Seale, H., Ray, P., & MacIntyre, C. R. (2013) · interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.2468 · Cited by 250
Liu, L., Miguel Cruz, A., Rios Rincon, A., Buttar, V., Ranson, Q., & Goertzen, D. (2015) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.923529 · Cited by 229
Castillo, V. H., Martínez-García, A. I., & Pulido, J. (2010) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-60 · Cited by 155
Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review
de Grood, C., Raissi, A., Kwon, Y., & Santana, M. (2016) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s103881 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Vishwanath, A., & Scamurra, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Western New York Health IT -Community Tracking
- Venue
- Health Informatics Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-134
- ISSN
- 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4582
- 1741-2811
- OpenAlex
- W2036991742
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- New York State Department of Health
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- electronic health records, EHR adoption, barriers to adoption, community physicians, conceptual model, concept mapping, standardization, interoperability, cost-benefit analysis, psychosocial barriers, diffusion of innovations
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Group Processes, Humans, Models, Theoretical, New York, Cluster Analysis, Medical Records Systems, Computerized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
