Cited by 12Medical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records SystemsData Quality and Management

Disparities in patient record completeness with respect to the health care utilization project

Nasir, Ayan, Liu, Xinliang, Gurupur, Varadraj, Qureshi, Zaeem·2019·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

Patient data completeness is an important characteristic in maintaining accurate health records and providing the highest standard of care. Furthermore, finding discrepancies in care based on different subpopulation parameters is important to identify areas of underlying systemic issues in order to address concerns and alleviate those discrepancies. In this project, the investigators use the Data Completeness Analysis Package to find trends in patient record completeness using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s State Inpatient Database for the state of Florida, specifically focusing on finding discrepancies among subpopulations along the variables of age, race, and gender. The results from testing Data Completeness Analysis Package with State Inpatient Database show a variety of patterns that provides insights to the health care delivery in Florida.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458217716005

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten of these (66%) identified that the incomplete data led to validity issues, most commonly that these data were not missing at random and had the potential to introduce bias.

    “Ten of these (66%) identified that the incomplete data led to validity issues, most commonly that these data were not missing at random and had the potential to introduced bias.12,34,43–50”
  • Some studies tested data quality assessment tools such as the Data Quality Assessment Tool and the Data Completeness Analysis Package.

    “Some studies tested data quality assessment tools such as the Data Quality Assessment Tool, created to evaluate patient records at Community Health Centers, and the Data Completeness Analysis Package.12,77”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Smedley B., 2003, Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care
  2. 10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01807-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00005650-200201000-00007 · DOI
  4. 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.139 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00132586-198502000-00054 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/qhc.10.2.90 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/jama.283.19.2579 · DOI
  8. 10.4338/ACI-2016-04-RA-0063 · DOI
  9. LaVeist T., 2013, Race, ethnicity, and health: a public health reader
  10. 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.S3-A.2 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.007 · DOI
  12. 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.325 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2105/AJPH.93.10.1713 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/phr/118.4.293 · DOI
  15. 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.398 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/fampra/cmn047 · DOI
  17. 10.1197/jamia.M1087 · DOI
  18. 10.1197/jamia.M3169 · DOI
  19. 10.1260/2040-2295.5.2.163 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.01.001 · DOI
  21. Robbins DE, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE southeast conference, 374
  22. 10.3233/jid-2016-0001 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.023 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nasir, A., Liu, X., Gurupur, V., & Qureshi, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Gurupur, Varadraj
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2017-08-08
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
401-416
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W2743352809
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
health records, health care utilization, racial disparities, age disparities, gender disparities, inpatient data, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Florida
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Analysis of Variance, Florida, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Healthcare Disparities, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review