Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students
Open accessAbstract
This article outlines the main results and methodological challenges of a large-scale survey on actual digital skills. A test covering three main dimensions of digital literacy (theoretical, operational and evaluation skills) was administered to a random sample of 65 third-year high school classes, producing data on 980 students. Items include knowledge questions, situation-based questions and tasks to be performed online. A Rasch-type model was used to score the results. In agreement with the literature, the sample performed better in operational skills, while showing a particularly poor performance regarding evaluation skills (although for this dimension the test shows reliability issues). Through a robust regression analysis we investigate if a skills divide based on ascriptive differences, gender and family cultural background, exists among the students. It emerges that cultural background has a significant effect, which is stronger on operational skills, while gender shows a more definite impact on theoretical knowledge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personal factors play an important role in the research as they seem to be a determinant of digital literacy.
“This factor, however, plays an important role in the research as it seems to be a determinant of digital literacy.”
From Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: a systematic literature review using text mining (2022) · cites this paper as Gui & Argentin, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 268
- Authors
- Gui, M., & Argentin, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Gui, Marco
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-03-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 963-980
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2111091342
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 33.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi di Trento
- Provincia Autonoma di Trento
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- digital literacy, digital skills, high school students, operational skills, assessment skills, theoretical knowledge, gender differences, digital divide, Rasch model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review