The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online political efficacy and political participation: A mediation analysis based on the evidence from Taiwan
Abstract
Consensus on the impact of information-oriented use of social media on political participation is lacking. Some argue a positive relationship, in that social media promotes participation through awakening the user’s agency, while others focus on the selection and disenabling effects of low-quality content. Nevertheless, both arguments focus almost exclusively on the objective conditions for participation and largely ignore users’ motivations to participate. Consequently, this article proposes online political efficacy as a mechanism linking the use of social media to political participation. Specifically, we argue that (1) the effect of the information-oriented use of social media on political participation is positively mediated through the user’s online political efficacy and (2) this mediation effect is only significant in the case of online political participation. We test these arguments within the framework of causal mediation analysis proposed by Imai et al. using data collected from the 2015 Taiwan Communication Survey.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One study, applying causal mediation analysis to assess a causal mechanism77, found that information-oriented social media use affects political participation, mediated or enabled through the user’s online political efficacy65.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
In the citing paper
“Common causal inference techniques that were used in our sample include instrumental variable designs that introduce exogenous variation in the treatment variable59–63, matching approaches to explicitly balance treatment and control groups64–66, and panel designs that account for unobserved confounders with unit and/or time-fixed effects67,68.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [65]
Citations
Cites
A general approach to causal mediation analysis.
Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0020761 · Cited by 4,143
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x · Cited by 2,229
Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects
Imai, K., Keele, L., & Yamamoto, T. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/10-sts321 · Cited by 1,628
Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2013) · doi:10.3998/mpub.2556282 · Cited by 1,140
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.1037/a0022086 · DOI · Paper page
- Bandura A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L · DOI · Paper page
- Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0894439309334325 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511615573 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10584609.2010.540305 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542 · DOI
- 10.1177/0894439318814190. · DOI
- 10.1177/104649602237169 · DOI
- Campbell A, Gurin G, Miller WE (1954) The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co.
- Chadwick A (2006) Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.012 · DOI
- Craig SC, Maggiotto MA (1982) Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology 8(3): 85–109.
- 10.1093/pa/gsv055 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002764213489011 · DOI
- Easton D (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
- 10.1093/ijpor/edv003 · DOI
- 10.2307/2111186 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jcc4.12198 · DOI
- 10.1080/08838151.2013.787079 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1049096509090052 · DOI
- 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400837496 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055411000414 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/268589 · DOI
- 10.1177/1081180X03008003002 · DOI
- Karlsson M (2011) The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 12(3): 279–295.
- 10.1080/10584609.2016.1174760 · DOI
- Lane RE (1959) Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. New York: Free Press.
- Leandros N, Doudaki V (2009) General interest and specialized newspapers’ business models and their impact on print and online content. In: Albarran A, Faustino P, Santos R (eds) The Media as a Driver of the Information Society. Lisbon: Media XXI/Formal Press, pp. 641–659.
- 10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007123402000194 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511803987 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S99 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1266375 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002764213515220 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769900508200306 · DOI
- 10.1080/21670811.2013.872420 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511609343 · DOI
- Pei Z (2014) A comparative study on residents’ political efficacy in urban and rural China. CASS Journal of Political Science 30(4): 63–72.
- 10.1017/CBO9781139878425 · DOI
- 10.1145/358916.361990 · DOI
- Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- 10.1080/19331681003753420 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x · DOI
- Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM, Reeves K (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- 10.2307/2533160 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.2000.10474233 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1229005 · DOI
- 10.1177/1081180X0200700304 · DOI
- 10.1080/105846001750322952 · DOI
- 10.1177/009365001028004005 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769900207900412 · DOI
- Shirky C (2011) The political power of social media technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs 90(1): 28–41.
- Skocpol T (2003) Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
- 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0162-895X.00156 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x · DOI
- Sundar SS (2008) The main model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ (eds) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 73–100.
- Sunstein CR (2001) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- 10.1177/0894439313490625 · DOI
- Tarrow S (1992) Mentalities, political cultures, and collective action frames: constructing meanings through action. In: Morris AD, Mueller CM (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 174–202.
- Tedesco JC (2004) Changing the channel: use of the Internet for communicating about politics. In: Kaid LL (ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 507–528.
- Tilly C (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- 10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002764213479375 · DOI
- 10.1080/08838151.2015.1054998 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444813518391 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2013.867356 · DOI
- 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226 · DOI
- Wang L, Fang R (2010) Participate or not: a social psychological analysis of Chinese citizens’ political participation. CASS Journal of Political Science 26(2): 95–108.
- 10.1093/pa/gsl014 · DOI
- 10.1177/00027640121957286 · DOI
- Westling M (2007) Expanding the public sphere: the impact of Facebook on political communication. Society 28(3): 835–860.
- 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318 · DOI
- Xia S (2017) Social media, political efficacy and political participation of young people in Taiwan. Youth Exploration 35(6): 100–110.
- 10.1002/1520-6629(199407)22:3<259::AID-JCOP2290220306>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- 10.1177/0894439309335162 · DOI
- 10.1177/0894439313489962 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C., Bai, Y., & Wang, R.
- Affiliations
- Xiamen University (CN)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Chao
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1667-1696
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2917716772
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- ministry of education of the people’s republic of china (17YJCGAT001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- political participation, social media use, mediating effect, user motivation, online political participation, Taiwan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review