The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction
Abstract
This article draws on work at the interface of grammar and interaction to argue that the clause is a locus of interaction, in the sense that it is one of the most frequent grammatical formats which speakers orient to in projecting what actions are being done by others' utterances and in acting on these projections. Yet the way in which the clause affords grammatical projectability varies significantly from language to language. In fact, it depends on the nature of the clausal grammatical formats which are available as resources in a language: in some languages these allow early projection in the turn unit (as in English), in others they do not (as in Japanese). We focus here on these two languages and show that their variable grammatical projectability has repercussions on the way in which three interactional phenomena – next-turn onset, co-construction, and turn-unit extension – are realized in the respective speech communities. In each case the practices used are precisely the ones which the clausal grammatical formats in the given language promote. The evidence thus suggests that clauses are interactionally warranted, if variably built, formats for social action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Between and within: alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments
Goodwin, C. (1986) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00148127 · Cited by 659 · cited 1×
“…with a language, speakers come to be able to project the trajectory of an utterance in progress, what it will take for that utterance to come to completion (Goodwin, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1986, 1989, 1995), and thereby to project what action is being implemented by that utterance in the given context.”
(1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.007 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Responses to Wh -Questions in English Conversation
Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2010) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351811003751680 · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
- Venue
- Discourse Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 481-505
- ISSN
- 1461-4456 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7080
- OpenAlex
- W2125845690
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461445605054403
- The paper
- Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.