Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction: A return to politics

Postero, Nancy, Elinoff, Eli·2019·Anthropological Theory

Abstract

What does politics mean in contemporary anthropology? Counter to propositions that argue that neoliberalism has produced a “post-political” condition, we argue the notion of a post-political world was never empirically accurate. Instead, using the ethnographic method, our contributors show ongoing and diverse forms of political practices and contestations in the contemporary moment. We reconsider politics at a conceptual level, defining politics as practices of world-making that proceed through the formulation of constellations of critique, disagreement, difference, and conflict. We build this definition through a discussion of contemporary theories of the post-political and agonistic politics, and by tracing a history of political anthropology. Finally, we consider politics as both a practice and a goal. The authors in this collection show that new political anthropologies are particularly attuned to questions of commoning/uncommoning, spaces of articulation and disarticulation, and struggles to live “otherwise.” We argue that a return to these questions with a robust and specific engagement with politics is necessary for anthropology and increasingly urgent given the global conjuncture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1463499618814933

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alvarez S, 1998, Cultures of Politics, Politics of Culture
  3. 10.1215/9780822373599 · DOI
  4. Appadurai A, 2000, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization
  5. 10.1080/13698230902892036 · DOI
  6. Arendt H, 1958, The Human Condition
  7. Aristotle, 1981, The Politics
  8. Bailey FG, 1969, Stratagems and Spoils: A Social Anthropology of Politics
  9. Barth F, 1965, Political Leadership among Swat Pathans (London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology
  10. Benjamin W, 1968, Illuminations, 253
  11. 10.1177/0263775816645989 · DOI
  12. 10.1215/9780822391180 · DOI
  13. Blaser M (2019) On the properly political (disposition for the) Anthropocene. Anthropological Theory 19(1): 74–94. · DOI
  14. 10.3138/anth.59.2.t01 · DOI
  15. Blom Hansen T, 2005, Sovereign Bodies, Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World, 10.1515/9781400826698 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0010417599003102 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/659748 · DOI
  19. 10.7208/chicago/9780226519838.001.0001 · DOI
  20. Chatterjee P, 2004, The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World
  21. Clastres P, 1989, Society Against the State
  22. Comaroff J, Comaroff J (1991) Of Revelation and Revolution , Volume 1: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  23. Corrigan P, 1985, The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution
  24. Crehan K, 2002, Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
  25. Crouch C, 2004, Post-Democracy
  26. Dagnino E (2003) Citizenship in Latin America: an introduction. Latin American Perspectives 30(2): 3–17. · DOI
  27. 10.1215/9780822375265 · DOI
  28. 10.1355/cs36-3b · DOI
  29. Elinoff E, 2016, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Review, 22, 620
  30. Elinoff E (2019) Subjects of politics: Between democracy and dictatorship in Thailand. Anthropological Theory 19(1): 143–169. · DOI
  31. Evans-Pritchard EE, 1940, The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People
  32. Ferguson J, 1994, The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00721.x · DOI
  34. 10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981 · DOI
  35. 10.7208/chicago/9780226257181.001.0001 · DOI
  36. Foucault M, 1991, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 87
  37. Foucault M, 1997, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–1976
  38. 10.1057/9780230274730 · DOI
  39. Fraser N, 1997, Habermas and the Public Sphere, 109
  40. 10.1515/9780804786447 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/02561751.1940.9676107 · DOI
  42. Gramsci A, 1971, Selections from the Prison Notebooks
  43. Graeber D, 2009, Direct Action: An Ethnography
  44. 10.1215/9780822394709 · DOI
  45. 10.1017/S0022216X02006521 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_4 · DOI
  47. 10.1525/luminos.20 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.7591/9780801456466 · DOI
  50. 10.7208/chicago/9780226331751.001.0001 · DOI
  51. 10.1525/california/9780520284227.001.0001 · DOI
  52. Holston J, 2008, Insurgent Citizenship: Democratic Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil
  53. Holston J (2019) Metropolitan rebellions and the politics of commoning the city. Anthropological Theory 19(1): 120–142. · DOI
  54. 10.1080/13604813.2017.1374780 · DOI
  55. 10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450 · DOI
  56. Leach ER, 1954, Political Systems of Highland Burma
  57. 10.1215/9780822389781 · DOI
  58. 10.1215/9780822376460 · DOI
  59. Marx K (, 1843, The Marx-Engels Reader, 26
  60. 10.1525/california/9780520205406.003.0002 · DOI
  61. Mitchell T (1999) Society, Economy, and the State Effect. In: Steinmets G (ed.) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 76–97. · DOI
  62. Mouffe C, 2005, On the Political: Thinking in Action
  63. 10.7208/chicago/9780226545417.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Muru-Lanning M, 2016, Tupuna Awa: People and Politics of the Waikato River
  65. Nash JC, 1993, We Eat the Mines and the Mines Eat Us: Dependency and Exploitation in Bolivian Tin Mines
  66. Ong A, 1999, Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality
  67. Ong A, 2005, Global Assemblages, Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems
  68. 10.1017/S0010417500019587 · DOI
  69. 10.14318/hau6.1.004 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Paley J, 2001, Marketing Democracy, Power and Social Movements in Post-Dictatorship Chile, 10.1525/9780520935747 · DOI
  71. Perry KK, 2013, Black Women Against the Land Grab: The Struggle for Racial Justice in Brazil
  72. Poole D, 2004, Anthropology in the Margins of the State
  73. Postero N, 2007, Now We Are Citizens: Indigenous Politics in Postmulticultural Bolivia
  74. 10.1525/luminos.31 · DOI
  75. Postero N and Fabricant N (2019) Indigenous sovereignty and the new developmentalism in plurinational Bolivia. Anthropological Theory 19(1): 95–119. · DOI
  76. 10.1215/9780822383673 · DOI
  77. 10.1215/00382876-1596236 · DOI
  78. Rancière J, 1999, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy
  79. 10.1353/tae.2003.0017 · DOI
  80. 10.2307/j.ctt7zw936 · DOI
  81. 10.1111/1467-9655.12044 · DOI
  82. Rose N, 1996, Foucault and Political Reason, 37
  83. 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 · DOI
  84. Roseberry, W (1996) Hegemony, power, and languages of contention. In: Wilmsen E and McAllister P (eds) The Politics of Difference . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  85. 10.1080/713658800 · DOI
  86. Schmitt C, 1932, The Concept of the Political
  87. Scott JC, 1985, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance
  88. Scott JC, 1998, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
  89. 10.1525/9780520912021 · DOI
  90. Smith LT, 1999, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
  91. 10.1525/california/9780520288492.001.0001 · DOI
  92. Stengers I, 2011, Cosmopolitics II
  93. 10.11126/stanford/9780804761468.001.0001 · DOI
  94. Swartz M, 1966, Political Anthropology
  95. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x · DOI
  96. 10.1177/0263276409358728 · DOI
  97. 10.1215/9780822373056-001 · DOI
  98. Vincent J, 2002, The Anthropology of Politics: A Reader in Ethnography, Theory, and Critique
  99. Viveiros de Castro E, 2004, Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 2, 3
  100. Von Clausewitz C ([1853] 1976) On War . Howard M and Paret P (trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI
  101. 10.23943/princeton/9780691170770.001.0001 · DOI
  102. Weber M, 1919, Politics as a Vocation
  103. Williams R, 1977, Marxism and Literature
  104. Wolf E, 1982, Europe and the People without History
  105. 10.7551/mitpress/5231.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Postero, N., & Elinoff, E.
Venue
Anthropological Theory
Published
2019-02-27
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
3-28
ISSN
  • 1463-4996
  • 1741-2641
Cited by
25
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review