Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Austerity, the state and common sense in Europe: A comparative perspective on Italy and Portugal

Alves de Matos, Patrícia, Pusceddu, Antonio Maria·2021·Anthropological Theory

Abstract

In this article, we examine the making of austerity as common sense, located at the intersection of state interventions and the everyday practices and moral logics through which austerity emerges as an acceptable livelihood possibility for individuals, households and communities. Our argument is based on a comparative analysis of austerity in Italy and Portugal, with a focus on popular austerities among working-class households in two post-industrial towns. With the aim of addressing the conundrum of the pervasiveness of austerity, we emphasise the relevance of Gramsci’s notion of common sense to expand the anthropological theorisation of austerity as a hegemonic project combining coercion and consent, capable of reconfiguring the state, and as a field of contradictions integral to the very making of common sense. We argue that austerity regimes become operative through the deployment of institutional coercive practices, moral arguments and the ideological co-optation of historical legacies of austerity embodied by ordinary people in their livelihood praxis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1463499621991326

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1515/9780804795548 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/1467-8322.12375 · DOI
  4. Berlinguer E, 1977, Austerità occasione per trasformare l’Italia
  5. 10.1057/9781137411129 · DOI
  6. Blyth M, 2013, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea
  7. 10.1111/1467-8330.00246 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1467-8675.12166 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0261018312444405 · DOI
  10. Comelli M, 2012, IAI Working Papers, 1217, 1
  11. 10.2307/j.ctt1pv8988.4 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/14747731.2018.1502495 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/07393148.2019.1642724 · DOI
  14. Crehan K, 2002, Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
  15. 10.1080/1354571X.2011.542987 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1215/9780822373742 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/13608749608539475 · DOI
  18. 10.1515/9789048505289 · DOI
  19. Finn D, 2017, New Left Review, 106, 5
  20. Forges Davanzati G and Paulì G (2015) Il mito della spesa pubblica come spreco: il caso italiano. In: di Maio A and Marani U (eds) Economia e luoghi comuni. Convenzione, retorica e riti . Rome: L’Asino d’oro, pp.123–156.
  21. Ginsborg P, 1990, A History of Contemporary Italy 1943–1980
  22. 10.1007/978-1-137-11741-0 · DOI
  23. Gramsci A, 1975, Quaderni del carcere
  24. Graziani A, 1998, Lo sviluppo dell’economia italiana: Dalla ricostruzione alla moneta europea
  25. Hall S, 1988, The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left
  26. 10.1007/978-1-349-15881-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hespanha P, 2000, Entre o Estado e o Mercado:
  28. International Monetary Fund, IMF (2013) Portugal: Technical assistance report: Rethinking the state – selected expenditure reform options. Country Report No. 13/6. Available at: www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2016/12/31/Portugal-Technical-Assistance-Report-Rethinking-the-State-Selected-Expenditure-Reform-Options-40225 (accessed 20 March 2020). · DOI
  29. 2013, Occupati e disoccupati
  30. 10.1057/978-1-137-48695-0 · DOI
  31. Knight D, 2016, Ethnographies of Austerity: Temporality, Crisis and Affect in Southern Europe
  32. Liguori G (2009) Common sense in Gramsci. In: Francese J (ed.) Perspectives on Gramsci: Politics, Culture and Social Theory . London: Routledge, pp.123–133.
  33. Loperfido G (2018) ‘Neither left nor right’: Crisis, wane of politics, and struggles for sovereignty. In: Kalb D and Mollona M (eds) Worldwide Mobilizations: Class Struggles and Urban Commoning . New York: Berghahn, pp.118–141. · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/s10624-019-09543-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/1469-8676.12267 · DOI
  36. Moschella M, 2017, Italian Political Science Review, 47, 205
  37. 10.1111/1475-6765.12190 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/02757206.2016.1167052 · DOI
  39. 10.1086/676327 · DOI
  40. Narotzky S, Pusceddu AM (2020) The challenge of social reproduction in times of crisis: Tensions between generations in Southern Europe. In: Narotzky S (ed.) Grassroots Economies: Living with Austerity in Southern Europe . London: Pluto, pp.143–170. · DOI
  41. Powers T, 2019, Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2019, 1, 10.3167/fcl.2019.830101 · DOI
  42. 10.2307/j.ctvw04cvv · DOI
  43. 10.3167/ajec.2018.270111 · DOI
  44. Reis J (ed.), 2014, A Economia Política do Retrocesso
  45. Rizzo S, 2007, La casta: Così i politici italiani sono diventati intoccabili
  46. 10.1179/1024529412Z.00000000013 · DOI
  47. Rossi S, 2008, La politica economica italiana 1968–2007
  48. Sarkis D, Matos P (2020) The body politics of austerity in Portugal and Spain: Women, dispossession and agency. In: Narotzky S (ed.) Grassroots Economies: Living with Austerity in Southern Europe . London: Pluto, pp.192–213. · DOI
  49. Smith G, 2004, Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2014, 99, 10.3167/092012904782311425 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/13511610.2018.1426983 · DOI
  51. 10.1177/1065912907306469 · DOI
  52. SVIMEZ, 2015, Rapporto
  53. 10.1163/ej.9789004167711.i-478 · DOI
  54. Watkins E (2011) Gramscian politics and capitalist common sense. In: Green M (ed.) Rethinking Gramsci . London: Routledge, pp.105–111.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Alves de Matos, P., & Pusceddu, A. M.
Venue
Anthropological Theory
Published
2021-02-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
494-519
ISSN
  • 1463-4996
  • 1741-2641
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (323743)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (CEECIND/01894/2018/CP1533/CT0001, PTDC/SOC-ANT/32676/2017, UIDB/04038/2020)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review