The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Austerity, the state and common sense in Europe: A comparative perspective on Italy and Portugal
Abstract
In this article, we examine the making of austerity as common sense, located at the intersection of state interventions and the everyday practices and moral logics through which austerity emerges as an acceptable livelihood possibility for individuals, households and communities. Our argument is based on a comparative analysis of austerity in Italy and Portugal, with a focus on popular austerities among working-class households in two post-industrial towns. With the aim of addressing the conundrum of the pervasiveness of austerity, we emphasise the relevance of Gramsci’s notion of common sense to expand the anthropological theorisation of austerity as a hegemonic project combining coercion and consent, capable of reconfiguring the state, and as a field of contradictions integral to the very making of common sense. We argue that austerity regimes become operative through the deployment of institutional coercive practices, moral arguments and the ideological co-optation of historical legacies of austerity embodied by ordinary people in their livelihood praxis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Austerity, for instance, is a case in point (Alves de Matos and Pusceddu 2021).”
From Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe (2022) · cites this paper as Alves de Matos and Pusceddu 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1515/9780804795548 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8322.12375 · DOI
- Berlinguer E, 1977, Austerità occasione per trasformare l’Italia
- 10.1057/9781137411129 · DOI
- Blyth M, 2013, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea
- 10.1111/1467-8330.00246 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8675.12166 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261018312444405 · DOI
- Comelli M, 2012, IAI Working Papers, 1217, 1
- 10.2307/j.ctt1pv8988.4 · DOI
- 10.1080/14747731.2018.1502495 · DOI
- 10.1080/07393148.2019.1642724 · DOI
- Crehan K, 2002, Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
- 10.1080/1354571X.2011.542987 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1215/9780822373742 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13608749608539475 · DOI
- 10.1515/9789048505289 · DOI
- Finn D, 2017, New Left Review, 106, 5
- Forges Davanzati G and Paulì G (2015) Il mito della spesa pubblica come spreco: il caso italiano. In: di Maio A and Marani U (eds) Economia e luoghi comuni. Convenzione, retorica e riti . Rome: L’Asino d’oro, pp.123–156.
- Ginsborg P, 1990, A History of Contemporary Italy 1943–1980
- 10.1007/978-1-137-11741-0 · DOI
- Gramsci A, 1975, Quaderni del carcere
- Graziani A, 1998, Lo sviluppo dell’economia italiana: Dalla ricostruzione alla moneta europea
- Hall S, 1988, The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left
- 10.1007/978-1-349-15881-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Hespanha P, 2000, Entre o Estado e o Mercado:
- International Monetary Fund, IMF (2013) Portugal: Technical assistance report: Rethinking the state – selected expenditure reform options. Country Report No. 13/6. Available at: www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2016/12/31/Portugal-Technical-Assistance-Report-Rethinking-the-State-Selected-Expenditure-Reform-Options-40225 (accessed 20 March 2020). · DOI
- 2013, Occupati e disoccupati
- 10.1057/978-1-137-48695-0 · DOI
- Knight D, 2016, Ethnographies of Austerity: Temporality, Crisis and Affect in Southern Europe
- Liguori G (2009) Common sense in Gramsci. In: Francese J (ed.) Perspectives on Gramsci: Politics, Culture and Social Theory . London: Routledge, pp.123–133.
- Loperfido G (2018) ‘Neither left nor right’: Crisis, wane of politics, and struggles for sovereignty. In: Kalb D and Mollona M (eds) Worldwide Mobilizations: Class Struggles and Urban Commoning . New York: Berghahn, pp.118–141. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10624-019-09543-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/1469-8676.12267 · DOI
- Moschella M, 2017, Italian Political Science Review, 47, 205
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12190 · DOI
- 10.1080/02757206.2016.1167052 · DOI
- 10.1086/676327 · DOI
- Narotzky S, Pusceddu AM (2020) The challenge of social reproduction in times of crisis: Tensions between generations in Southern Europe. In: Narotzky S (ed.) Grassroots Economies: Living with Austerity in Southern Europe . London: Pluto, pp.143–170. · DOI
- Powers T, 2019, Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2019, 1, 10.3167/fcl.2019.830101 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctvw04cvv · DOI
- 10.3167/ajec.2018.270111 · DOI
- Reis J (ed.), 2014, A Economia Política do Retrocesso
- Rizzo S, 2007, La casta: Così i politici italiani sono diventati intoccabili
- 10.1179/1024529412Z.00000000013 · DOI
- Rossi S, 2008, La politica economica italiana 1968–2007
- Sarkis D, Matos P (2020) The body politics of austerity in Portugal and Spain: Women, dispossession and agency. In: Narotzky S (ed.) Grassroots Economies: Living with Austerity in Southern Europe . London: Pluto, pp.192–213. · DOI
- Smith G, 2004, Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2014, 99, 10.3167/092012904782311425 · DOI
- 10.1080/13511610.2018.1426983 · DOI
- 10.1177/1065912907306469 · DOI
- SVIMEZ, 2015, Rapporto
- 10.1163/ej.9789004167711.i-478 · DOI
- Watkins E (2011) Gramscian politics and capitalist common sense. In: Green M (ed.) Rethinking Gramsci . London: Routledge, pp.105–111.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe
Streinzer, A., & Tosic, J. (2022) · Dialectical Anthropology · doi:10.1007/s10624-022-09679-0 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Alves de Matos, P., & Pusceddu, A. M.
- Venue
- Anthropological Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-02-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 494-519
- ISSN
- 1463-4996
- 1741-2641
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (323743)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (CEECIND/01894/2018/CP1533/CT0001, PTDC/SOC-ANT/32676/2017, UIDB/04038/2020)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review