The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory
Abstract
This special issue engages with the relationship between feminist theory and ‘the affective turn’. Through their analyses of a range of affective states, spheres and sites, the authors in this volume pose critical questions regarding feminist theoretical engagements with affect, emotion and feeling. They ask whether it is necessarily a positive move to put affect theory and feminist theory together, or whether there are inherent risks, for example of depoliticisation, or of an over-privileging of the individual; whether feminist theorists have made, or can make, distinctive contributions to conceptualising affect; and what particular insights feminist theory can bring to bear. In different ways, the authors featured here consider how we can understand the complex implications of the turn to affect in and for feminist theory, and how we might examine its potentialities for theoretical, political and social transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.
Johnson, M. M., & Gilligan, C. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067520 · Cited by 11,111
In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development
Gilligan, & Carol, C. (1982) · Cited by 10,869
The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling
Tropman, J. E., & Hochschild, A. R. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324333 · Cited by 8,746
The Cultural Politics of Emotion
Ahmed, S. (2014) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780748691142 · Cited by 8,060
Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence
Butler, J. (2004) · Cited by 7,903
Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter
Barad, K. (2003) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/345321 · Cited by 7,055
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1461 · Cited by 6,721
Fanon, F. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-46 · Cited by 6,307
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
Green, P. A., & Haraway, D. J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076334 · Cited by 5,455
Cited by
Feminist responses to COVID-19 in China through the lens of affect
Zhang, J. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2041694 · Cited by 22
How emotions shape feminist coalitions
Whittier, N. (2021) · European Journal of Women's Studies · doi:10.1177/13505068211029682 · Cited by 19
Narrative Therapy and the Affective Turn: Part I
Monk, G., & Zamani, N. (2019) · Journal of Systemic Therapies · doi:10.1521/jsyt.2019.38.2.1 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A.
- Venue
- Feminist Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-129
- ISSN
- 1464-7001 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2773
- OpenAlex
- W1997980280
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 23.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1464700112442635
- The paper
- Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112442635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.