The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The objectivity norm in American journalism*
Abstract
Why did the occupational norm of ‘objectivity’ arise in American journalism? This question has attracted the interest of many journalism historians but it has not previously been examined as an instance of a more general social phenomenon, the emergence of new cultural norms and ideals. Four conditions for the emergence of new norms are identified – two having to do with the self-conscious pursuit of internal group solidarity; and two having to do with the need to articulate the ideals of social practice in a group in order to exercise control over subordinates and to pass on group culture to the next generation. Reviewing the history of the professionalization of American journalism, this essay identifies the late 19th and early 20th century as the period when these conditions crystallized. Alternative technological and economic explanations of the emergence of objectivity are criticized and the difficulty of understanding why objectivity as a norm emerged first and most fully in the United States rather than in European journalism is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Bent, Silas, 1927, Ballyhoo
- Buel, Richard Jr, 1980, The Press and the American Revolution
- Cannon, Joseph, 1927, Uncle Joe Cannon
- Carey, James, 1989, Communication and Culture
- 10.1177/0267323196011003002 · doi:10.1177/0267323196011003002
- 10.2307/1920255 · doi:10.2307/1920255
- 10.1086/468036 · DOI · Paper page
- Davis, Elmer, 1921, History of The New York Times 185l–192l
- Dewey, John, 1930, Individualism Old and New
- Donsbach, Wolfgang, 1995, Media Studies Journal, 9, 17
- 10.1177/001654929305100104 · doi:10.1177/001654929305100104
- Emery, Michael, 1996, The Press and America: An Interpretive History of the Mass Media
- Emery, Michael, Edwin Emery and Nancy Roberts (1996) The Press and America: An Interpretive History of the Mass Media, p. 181-181. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Franklin, Benjamin, 1989, Benjamin Franklin: Writings
- Grady, Henry, 1879, Atlanta Constitution, 1
- Gramling, Oliver, 1940, AP: The Story of News
- Gruening, Ernest, 1931, The Public Pays
- Hallin, Daniel C., 1986, The ‘Uncensored War’: The Media and Vietnam
- Hanna, Paul, 1920, The Nation lll, 398
- Kaplan, Richard, Social Science History Association Annual Meeting
- Kelly, Eugene A., 1935, American Mercury, 34, 307
- King, Elliot (1992) ‘Ungagged Partisanship: The Political Values of the Public Press, 1835–1920’, PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
- Lippmann, Walter, 1920, Liberty and the News
- Maier, Pauline, 1980, The Old Revolutionaries
- Main, T. Jackson, 1961, The Antifederalists
- 10.2307/1290070 · DOI · Paper page
- McGerr, Michael, 1986, The Decline of Popular Politics
- Michael, George, 1935, Handout
- Odegard, Peter, 1930, The American Public Mind
- Pratte, Paul A., 1995, Gods Within the Machine: A History of the American Society of Newspaper Editors, 1923–1993, 10.5040/9798216969884 · doi:10.5040/9798216969884
- Purcell, Edward, 1973, The Crisis of Democratic Theory
- Ritchie, Donald, 1991, The Press Gallery, 10.4159/9780674042780 · doi:10.4159/9780674042780
- Rosenberg, Norman, 1984, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 108, 399
- Schudson, Michael, 1978, Discovering the News
- Schudson, Michael, 1995, The Power of News
- Schudson, Michael, 1998, The Good Citizen: A History of American Public Life
- Schudson, Michael, 1998, The Politics of News/The News of Politics
- Seitz, Don C., 1926, Outlook, 142, 209
- 10.1177/107769906704400101 · doi:10.1177/107769906704400101
- 10.1177/107769906804500217 · doi:10.1177/107769906804500217
- Shaw, Donald L., 1971, Mass Media and the National Experience
- 10.1177/107769909006700453 · doi:10.1177/107769909006700453
- Sussmann, Leila A. (1947) ‘The Public Relations Movement in America’, MA dissertation, University of Chicago.
- 10.1086/225193 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Social media and the formation of organizational reputation
Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0280 · Cited by 428
Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition
Levendusky, M. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737435 · Cited by 236
Bearing Witness While Black: African Americans, Smartphones, and the New Protest #Journalism
Richardson, A. V. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190935528.001.0001 · Cited by 169
Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects
Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526 · Cited by 124
Lindgren, M. (2023) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2021.1943497 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Schudson, M.
- Venue
- Journalism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-170
- ISSN
- 1464-8849 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3001
- OpenAlex
- W2119648844
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The objectivity norm in American journalism*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/146488490100200201
- The paper
- Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism*. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.