The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studies of user-generated content: A systematic review
Abstract
This article presents a review of communication research on user-generated content with a special focus on studies which include a content analysis. The trends of research on this comparatively new and rapidly developing subject are systematically discussed and desiderata are identified. The evaluation is based on a content analysis of pertinent approaches in nine relevant international peer-reviewed journals published from 2004 to 2012. From the results, the article concludes that user-generated content is approached by scholars from a variety of perspectives and offers scope for interdisciplinary cooperation but also notes that several of the challenges posed by the continuously changing nature of the content are not fully met.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many professional journalists don’t trust the content generated by citizen journalists because it often lacks accuracy, professionalism, and objectivity”
From Understanding media empowerment: citizen journalism in Palestine (2023) · cites this paper as Naab and Sehl, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x · Cited by 3,068
Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512780802281065 · Cited by 705
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Allen S, 2009, Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives
- 10.1177/1464884911412826 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444815621512. · DOI
- 10.1080/13614568.2011.563626 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2753/JOA0091-3367350309 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769589304800408 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444810389569 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512780701504864 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884910388230 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769900308000102 · DOI
- 10.1177/146144402321466796 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077699015607338 · DOI
- 10.1080/19312458.2014.937528 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769900007700107 · DOI
- 10.1080/14616700801999287 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781452231471.n9 · DOI
- Naab TK, 2014, Automatisierung in der Inhaltsanalyse, 127
- 10.1080/17512781003642923 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01381.x · DOI
- 10.1080/14616700500533528 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444812462846 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-531-91094-9_8 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884907076459 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444804039912 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884911412704 · DOI
- Sehl A, 2014, Von der Gutenberg-Galaxis zur Google-Galaxis. Alte und neue Grenzvermessungen nach 50 Jahren DGPuK, 117
- 10.1002/9781444340747 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769900107800403 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444809342762 · DOI
- 10.1177/107769900408100212 · DOI
- 10.1080/17512786.2012.667272 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884911421705 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/089443930001800304 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444813520477 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding media empowerment: citizen journalism in Palestine
Horoub, I. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01526-z · Cited by 14
“These challenges include privacy issues, national security, and libel laws, as well as the complexities of the editorial policy of their media organizations (Naab and Sehl, 2016; Vos et al., 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Naab, T. K., & Sehl, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg, Germany
- University of Oxford, UK
- Venue
- Journalism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-10-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1256-1273
- ISSN
- 1464-8849
- 1741-3001
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
