Use of folic acid supplements in the first trimester of pregnancy
Abstract
Folic acid supplementation in the periconceptual period is known to reduce the risk of neural tube defects. High dose supplementation prevents a high proportion of recurrent defects, whilst low doses reduce the risk of first occurrences. The Department of Health advises all women considering pregnancy to take folate supplements for 12 weeks prior to conception and in the first trimester of pregnancy. Surveys of the British population indicate that the uptake of this advice is poor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the uptake of advice in a group of Northampton women between January and June 2001. A total of 301 Caucasian women were recruited through an antenatal dating scan clinic. The women were aged between 16 and 42 years and completed a questionnaire concerning nutritional supplements prior to and during pregnancy and a five-day food diary, which was used to estimate dietary folate intakes. Of the women 67% consumed folate-containing supplements in the first trimester of pregnancy and 43% reported taking folate before becoming pregnant. Women under the age of 21 years were less likely to take folate supplements than women over the age of 21 years (p = 0.007), as were smokers (p < 0.001) and women from lower social classes. Mean folate intakes, including supplements, were 511 +/- 17 micrograms per day and unsupplemented dietary intakes were 237 +/- 5 micrograms per day. Of the women interviewed, 24.5% had folate intakes below the reference nutrient intake for pregnancy (300 micrograms per day). The data supports the assertion that neural tube defects are more likely to be prevented through the fortification of staple foods than through supplementation, but highlights the fact that young women from poor social backgrounds may still require close monitoring and support.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Less than 40% of women of childbearing age in the UK take folic acid supplements according to guidelines.
“Similarly, although most women of childbearing age in the UK are aware of the need to take folic acid supplements to prevent neural tube defects should they become pregnant, less than 40% do so according to guidelines. 98”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [98]
Compliance with recommendations on lifestyle change in pregnancy is lower in younger women and those from impoverished backgrounds.
“Generally compliance with recommendations on lifestyle change in pregnancy is greatest in women having their first baby and better educated women. Compliance is lower in younger women and those from impoverished backgrounds. 98”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [98]
Most women of childbearing age in the UK are aware of the need to take folic acid supplements to prevent neural tube defects should they become pregnant.
“Similarly, although most women of childbearing age in the UK are aware of the need to take folic acid supplements to prevent neural tube defects should they become pregnant, less than 40% do so according to guidelines. 98”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [98]
Compliance with recommendations on lifestyle change in pregnancy is greatest in women having their first baby and better educated women.
“Generally compliance with recommendations on lifestyle change in pregnancy is greatest in women having their first baby and better educated women. Compliance is lower in younger women and those from impoverished backgrounds. 98”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [98]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Langley-Evans, S. C., & Langley-Evans, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Nutritional Biochemistry, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, England,
- University of Northampton (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-186
- ISSN
- 1466-4240 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084690262
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
- Keywords
- folic acid supplementation, first trimester, neural tube defects, periconceptional period, folate intake, dietary folate, food fortification, social class, smoking, young women, prenatal care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Diet Records, Chi-Square Distribution, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review