Cited by 35Folate and B Vitamins ResearchMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

Use of folic acid supplements in the first trimester of pregnancy

Langley-Evans, S C, Langley-Evans, A J·2002·Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health

Abstract

Folic acid supplementation in the periconceptual period is known to reduce the risk of neural tube defects. High dose supplementation prevents a high proportion of recurrent defects, whilst low doses reduce the risk of first occurrences. The Department of Health advises all women considering pregnancy to take folate supplements for 12 weeks prior to conception and in the first trimester of pregnancy. Surveys of the British population indicate that the uptake of this advice is poor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the uptake of advice in a group of Northampton women between January and June 2001. A total of 301 Caucasian women were recruited through an antenatal dating scan clinic. The women were aged between 16 and 42 years and completed a questionnaire concerning nutritional supplements prior to and during pregnancy and a five-day food diary, which was used to estimate dietary folate intakes. Of the women 67% consumed folate-containing supplements in the first trimester of pregnancy and 43% reported taking folate before becoming pregnant. Women under the age of 21 years were less likely to take folate supplements than women over the age of 21 years (p = 0.007), as were smokers (p < 0.001) and women from lower social classes. Mean folate intakes, including supplements, were 511 +/- 17 micrograms per day and unsupplemented dietary intakes were 237 +/- 5 micrograms per day. Of the women interviewed, 24.5% had folate intakes below the reference nutrient intake for pregnancy (300 micrograms per day). The data supports the assertion that neural tube defects are more likely to be prevented through the fortification of staple foods than through supplementation, but highlights the fact that young women from poor social backgrounds may still require close monitoring and support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/146642400212200315

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 35

Authors
Langley-Evans, S. C., & Langley-Evans, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Nutritional Biochemistry, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, England,
  • University of Northampton (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health
Published
2002-09
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
181-186
ISSN
1466-4240 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084690262
Cited by
35
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
folic acid supplementation, first trimester, neural tube defects, periconceptional period, folate intake, dietary folate, food fortification, social class, smoking, young women, prenatal care
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Diet Records, Chi-Square Distribution, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review