Betwixt and be Tween: Age Ambiguity and the Sexualization of the Female Consuming Subject
Abstract
In this article, we argue that what is now known as the ‘tween’ cannot be understood apart from its inception in, and articulation with, the market exigencies of childhood - specifically girlhood - as they have emerged since the Second World War. Drawing upon trade discourses from the children’s clothing industry since the 1940s, interviews with children and views expressed by children’s market observers, we demonstrate how ‘the tween’ (or subteen/preteen) has been constructed and maintained as an ambiguous, age-delineated marketing and merchandising category. This category tends to produce and reproduce a ‘female consuming subject’ who has generally been presumed to be white, middle or upper middle class and heterosexual. Building upon historical materials, we focus much of our efforts on analyzing contemporary cultural commercial iterations of the tween as they have arisen since the early 1990s, a time when clothing makers and entrepreneurs of childhood redoubled their efforts to define a market semantic space for the Tween on the continuum of age-based goods and meanings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The tween consumer is a group in transition, often trying to distance themselves from the child label but not part of the teen cohort.
“However, they are also a group in transition, often trying to distance themselves from the child label but yet not part of teen cohort (Anderson et al., 2007;Samson and Conlon, 2006;Cook and Kaiser, 2004).”
From Young people's use of online social networking sites – a uses and gratifications perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Cook and Kaiser, 2004
The tween segment exists in an unstable and fickle culture where they are constantly experimenting with their social identity.
“The tween segment exists in an unstable and fickle culture where they are constantly experimenting with their social identity (Samson and Conlon, 2006;Cook and Kaiser, 2004).”
From Young people's use of online social networking sites – a uses and gratifications perspective (2010) · cites this paper as Cook and Kaiser, 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Cook, D. T., & Kaiser, S. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Culture
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-227
- ISSN
- 1469-5405 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2900
- OpenAlex
- W2099966300
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 142.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Culture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- tweens, girlhood, children's clothing industry, children's market, merchandising, commercialization of childhood, consumerism, gender and consumption, postwar consumer culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review