Cited by 16Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural HeritageLatin American Cultural Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is all Archaeology at Present a Postcolonial One?: Constructive Answers from an Eccentric Point of View

Pagán-Jiménez, Jaime R.·2004·Journal of Social Archaeology

Abstract

In this short reflective paper, I stress the importance of situating the multiple archaeological practices of Latin America in their particular contexts, in reaction to the so-called ‘globalized’ and/or ‘postcolonial’ archaeologies practiced today. I argue that the different processes that give rise to the many ways of practicing our discipline around the world are embedded in multiple and divergent dynamics of socio-cultural and political interactions. I suggest that rather than simply adopting new forms of theorization imported from the usual theoretical production centers, we need to open new, dialectical and parallel channels of communication to articulate more balanced characterizations of the world’s archaeological practices. Examining and understanding the many places (and circumstances) of action of the different archaeological practices (i.e. analyzing the multiple archaeological practices in their own context) allows a more coherent flow and linkage of information between praxis and theories inherent in particular socio-political contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469605304041075

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bartolomé, M.A. (1998) ‘Procesos Civilizatorios, Pluralismo Cultural y Autonomías Étnicas en América Latina’, in M.A. Bartolomé and A. Barabas (eds) Autonomías Étnicas y Estados Nacionales , pp. 171-94. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
  2. Cardoso de Oliveira, R. (2003) ‘El Movimiento de los Conceptos en la Antropología, Cataurs’, Revista Cubana de Antropología 4(7): 88-101.
  3. Gosden, C. (2001) ‘Postcolonial Archaeology: Issues of Culture, Identity and Knowledge’, in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological Theory Today, pp. 241-261. Cambridge: Polity Press .
  4. Hostos, A. de (1941) ‘Notes on West Indian Hydrography in its Relation to Prehistoric Migrations’, in Anthropological Papers: Papers Based Principally on Studies of the Prehistoric Archaeology and Ethnology of the Greater Antilles, pp. 30-53. San Juan: Office of the Historian, Government of Puerto Rico .
  5. Moore, A. (2001) ‘Postcolonial “Textual Space”: Towards an Approach’ , SOAS Literary Review 3, URL (consulted Dec. 2002): http://www.soas.ac.uk.soaslit/issue3/Moore.pdf
  6. Moraña, M. (1998) ‘El ‘Boom’ del Subalterno’, Cuadernos Americanos 1(67): 214-22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Pagán-Jiménez, J. R.
Affiliations
Anthropology, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras/Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico,
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Published
2004-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
200-213
ISSN
  • 1469-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2951
OpenAlex
W2050319181
Cited by
15
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
Keywords
Latin American archaeology, postcolonial archaeology, archaeological theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review