Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Peace maintenance and political messages: The significance of walls during and after the Northern Irish ‘Troubles’

McAtackney, Laura·2011·Journal of Social Archaeology

Abstract

The role of wall murals — as both territorial markers and as a means of maintaining and reinforcing identity — has been a frequent subject of study as a way of understanding the recent conflict in Northern Ireland, euphemistically known as ‘the Troubles’ (c. 1969—c. 1998). Whilst the heightened political and social relevance of murals and graffiti during civil conflict is undoubtedly a worthy subject of study, the role of their physical context — walls — has not been so thoroughly analysed and deconstructed. In the context of Northern Ireland, walls have had multiple uses and meanings — they can be not only blank canvases to facilitate communication but also physical barriers that solidify social relations and prevent interaction. This article examines the dual role of walls both during and in the aftermath of conflict as a means of highlighting their positive and negative attributes and de-essentializing their existence. It is suggested that there is a need to contextualize and consider the current and potential role of walls in the maintenance of peace and facilitating a ‘new’ Northern Ireland.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469605310392321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1887/0750309016/b1142c1 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0003598X00063742 · DOI
  3. Birrell D. ( 1994) Social policy responses to urban violence in Northern Ireland. In: Dunn S (ed.) Managing Divided Cities. Keele: Keele University Press, 105-18.
  4. Blakeley EJ and Snyder MG ( 1995) Fear manifest: Divided we fall: Gated and walled communities in the US. In: Ellin N (ed.) Architecture of Fear. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 85-101.
  5. Boal FW ( 1994) Encapsulation: Urban dimensions of national conflict . In: Dunn S (ed.) Managing Divided Cities. Keele: Keele University Press, 30-41.
  6. 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00013-6 · DOI
  7. Community Relations Council, 2009, Towards Sustainable Security: Interface Barriers and the Legacy of Segregation in Belfast
  8. Coogan TP, 1995, The Troubles
  9. Crooke E. ( 2005) The construction of community through heritage in Northern Ireland. In: McCarthy M (ed.) Ireland’s Heritages: Critical Perspectives on Memory and Identity . Aldershot: Ashgate, 223-35. · DOI
  10. Davis M., 1986, Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the US Working Class
  11. Davis M., 2000, Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the US City
  12. Davis M., 2002, Dead Cities and Other Tales
  13. Ellis MH, Chicago Journal of International Law, 5, 271
  14. Hall M. ( 1999) Subaltern voices? Finding the spaces between things and words. In: Funari P, Hall M and Jones S (eds) Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge. London: Routledge, 193-204.
  15. Hall M., 2000, Archaeology and the Modern World: Colonial Transcripts in South Africa and the Chesapeake
  16. 10.1080/17550910802622645 · DOI
  17. 10.3917/mult.018.0187 · DOI
  18. Hepburn AC ( 2001) Long division and ethnic conflict: The experience of Belfast. In: Dunn S (ed.) Managing Divided Cities Keele : Keele University Press, 88-105.
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511597237 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1068/b140363 · DOI
  21. Jarman N. ( 1993) Intersecting Belfast. In: Bender B (ed.) Landscape: Perspective and Politics. London: Berg, 107-39. · DOI
  22. Jarman N. ( 1998) Painting landscapes: The place of murals in the symbolic construction of urban space. In: Buckley AD (ed.) Symbols in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, 121-47.
  23. 10.1080/13575270108413230 · DOI
  24. Lauber MC, Design and Social Space in a Divided City
  25. 10.1080/14733280600807112 · DOI
  26. McAtackney L., 2008, An historical archaeology of political imprisonment: Long Kesh/ Maze prison, Northern Ireland. Unpublished PhD thesis
  27. 10.1177/1359183505050094 · DOI
  28. Marcuse P. ( 1994) Walls as metaphors and reality. In: Dunn S (ed.) Managing Divided Cities. Keele: Keele University Press, 41-52.
  29. Marcuse P. ( 1997) Walls of fear and walls of support. In: Ellin N (ed.) Architecture of Fear. New York: Princeton Architectural Press , 101-14.
  30. Mulholland M., 2001, The Longest War: Northern Ireland’s Troubled History
  31. 10.1177/1359183508095496 · DOI
  32. Rolston B., 1992, Drawing Support: Murals in the North of Ireland (1)
  33. Rolston B., 1995, Drawing Support: Murals of War and Peace (2)
  34. Selwyn T. ( 2001) Landscapes of separation: Reflections on the symbolism of by-pass roads in Palestine. In: Bender B and Winer M (eds) Contested Landscapes: Movement, Exile and Place. Oxford : Berg, 225-41. · DOI
  35. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816666676.001.0001 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/13698230600941978 · DOI
  37. Viggiani E., 2006, Public forms of memorialisation to the ‘Victims of the Northern Irish ‘‘Troubles’’ ’ in the City of Belfast. MA Thesis
  38. Weiner R., 1976, Community Action: The Belfast Experience
  39. Weizman E., 2007, Hollow Land: Architecture of Occupation
  40. Woods O., 1995, Seeing is Believing? Murals in Derry

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McAtackney, L.
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Published
2011-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
77-98
ISSN
  • 1469-6053
  • 1741-2951
Cited by
26
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review