Collaborative testing: Cognitive and interpersonal processes related to enhanced test performance
Abstract
Research has demonstrated that collaborative testing, working on tests in groups, leads to improved test scores but the mechanism by which this occurs has not been specified. Three factors were proposed as mediators: cognitive processes, interpersonal interactions and reduced test-anxiety. Thirty-three students completed a multiple-choice exam individually and in two-person collaborative groups. Test anxiety was reduced but was not directly related to increased exam scores. Improved exam scores were directly related to three cognitive processes: remembering information better, an increased ability to think about the information being tested and having good discussions. Both direct and indirect paths between cognitive variables and enhanced test outcomes were found. Good interpersonal interactions were independently related to satisfaction with the collaborative process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Kapitanoff, S. H.
- Affiliations
- American Jewish University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kapitanoff, Susan H.
- ORCID
- Kapitanoff, Susan H.
- Venue
- Active Learning in Higher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-70
- ISSN
- 1469-7874 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2625
- OpenAlex
- W2123331271
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Active Learning in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- collaborative testing, group testing, test anxiety, test scores, cognitive processes, interpersonal interaction, multiple-choice tests, student satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review